Walsh v. DeVry, Inc., Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Located in the United States of DeVry, Inc. et al
Filing
122
MOTION by Plaintiff Kimberly A. Walsh, Defendants DeVry, Inc., Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Located in the United States of DeVry, Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America for judgment (alternative) Pursuant to Rule52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to vacate the current trial date (Motley, Cinthia)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) DeVry, Inc., LONG TERM DISABILITY ) COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES ) LOCATED IN UNITED STATES OF ) DeVry, Inc.; and PRUDENTIAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ) ) Defendants. ) KIMBERLY A. WALSH,
Case No. 07cv1478
JOINT MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 52 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND TO VACATE THE CURRENT TRIAL DATE Plaintiff Kimberly Walsh ("Walsh") and Defendants DeVry, Inc., ("DeVry"), Long Term Disability Coverage for all Employees Located in United States of DeVry, Inc. ("Plan"), and The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"), jointly, by their undersigned attorneys, move this Honorable Court for an alternative judgment pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to vacated the current March 16, 2009 trial date, and in support state as follows: 1. The Parties have both moved for summary judgment. Pursuant to the Court's
February 2, 2009 order (Docket #115), the Court vacated several pre-trial dates but maintained the bench trial set for March 16, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The Court also urged the Parties to consider and discuss settlement. Since then, the Parties have fully briefed their summary judgment motions, which are now pending before the Court. 2. The Parties have also engaged in ongoing good faith settlement discussions,
which included a private mediation in January 2008. Most recently, upon the Court's urging, the
562859.1
Parties have continued to engage in settlement discussions. However, the Parties have now ceased settlement discussions as they continue to be drastically apart as to a settlement amount. 3. The Parties have also conferred regarding trial of this matter and have stipulated
to a trial on the papers. As such, the Parties jointly request that in the event that both pending motions for summary judgment are denied, the Court rule on this matter pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, so it may weigh the evidence and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. 4. This Court has held that this approach is appropriate when reviewing ERISA
claims in accordance with precedent from the Seventh Circuit as well as from other circuits. See, Marshall v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'n, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68956, *2-6 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 13, 2006) (Filip, J.); see also, Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 274 F.3d 456, 461 (7th Cir. 2001) (deciding, in an ERISA case, that the applicable standard of review was the one found in Rule 52(a), where the parties stipulated to the facts that made up the administrative record, and "the procedure the parties followed . . . [was] more akin to a bench trial than to a summary judgment ruling."); accord Kearney v. Standard Ins. Co., 175 F.3d 1084, 1094-1095 (9th Cir. 1999) (remanding ERISA benefits case to district court for a bench trial pursuant to Rule 52(a) on the record submitted to the plan administrator where there were disputed factual questions). The documents tendered by the Parties to the Court are admissible as a whole as a business record pursuant to Rule 803(6) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Traum v. The Equitable Life Assur. Society of the U.S., 240 F. Supp. 2d 776 (N.D. Ill. 2002). 5. The Parties also jointly request that this Court vacate the bench trial date set for
March 16, 2009.
562859.1
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff KIMBERLY WALSH and Defendants DeVRY, INC., LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES LOCATED IN UNITED STATES OF DeVry PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant their Joint Motion for an Alternative Judgment Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to Vacate the Current March 16, 2009 trial date.
Dated: March 5, 2009
Respectfully Submitted,
KIMBERLY WALSH,
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
By:_
/s/ Steven C. Fuoco
By:_
/s/ Cinthia G. Motley Daniel J. McMahon, Esq. Jason M. Kuzniar, Esq. Cinthia G. Motley, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 120 North La Salle Street, 26th Fl. Chicago, Illinois 60602 Tel. (312) 704-0550 Fax (312) 704-1522
Steven C. Fuoco Steven C. Fuoco, Attorney at law 1055 Golf Avenue Highland Park, IL 60035 Tel. (847) 681-9596 Fax: (847) 409-1788
562859.1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 5, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. Steven C. Fuoco 1055 Golf Avenue Highland Park, IL 60035
By:
s/ Cinthia G. Motley Cinthia G. Motley, Esq.
562859.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?