Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 07520000000003091437. by Daralyn J. Durie (Durie, Daralyn)
Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
United States District Court Northern District of
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
Vulcan Golf: LLC
Google, Inc., et aL.
Case Number: 07CV3371
Daralyn J. Durie
hereby apply to the Court
under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of
by whom I have been retained.
I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts:
Title of Court
(\..:J/1 IIi//"'(\(\'2 V / i- kVVJ
Supreme Court of the State of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States Court of j\~ppea! for the Federal Circuit
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMNT FOR MORE COURTS IN GOOD STANDING
I have currently, or within the year preceding the date ofthis application, made pro hac vice applications to this Court in the following actions:
Date of Application (Granted or Denied)*
*If denied, please explain:
(Attach additional form if
Pursuant to Local Rule 83.15(a), applicants who do not have an offce within the Northern District of lIinois must designate, at the fiing their initial notice or pleading, a member of the bar of this Court having an offce within this District upon who service of papers may be made.
Has the applicant designated local counsel? Yes (ê
If you have not designated local counsel, Local Rule 83 .15(b) provides that the designation must be made within thirt (30) days.
Has the applicant ever been:
censured, suspended, disbarred, or witherwise disciplined by any
or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the
applicant's professional conduct?
r(ê (ê (ê
transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the
bar of nay court?
denied admission to the bar of any court?
held in contempt of court?
NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of
the incident(s) and the applicant's current
status before any court, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations of the applicant's conduct may have been instituted.
I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of lIinois, effective November 12, 1991 (Local Rules 83.50 through 83.58), and the Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, effective December 15, 1992, and wil faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Sep 9, 2008
S/ Daralyn J. Durie
Electronic Signature of Applicant
Applicant's Law Firm
Keker & Van Nest LLP
710 Sansome Street
Work Phone Number
(The pro hac vice admission fee is $100.00 for cases fied before February 1,2001, and $50.00 for cases fied on or after that date, and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective unti such time as the fee has been paid.)
NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider fiing a petition for admission to the general bar of
the Court. The fee for admission to the General Bar is $100.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $100.00 for cases fied
before Februar 1,2001, and $50.00 for cases fied on or after that date. Admission to the general bar permits an attorney
to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application for such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.
Daralvn J. Durie
Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attachment Admittance to Practice in the Following Courts
Supreme Cour of the State of
California, Februar 9, 1994
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, August 24, 1994
United States Distrct Cour, Eastern District of
California, November 13, 1998
United States Distrct Court, Central Distrct of California, November 17, 1998
United States Distrct Court, Southern District of
California, November 8, 1999
California, Januar 5, 2000
United States District Cour, Northern Distrct of
United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, May 14, 2003
United States Cour of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, July 28, 2006
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?