Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 204

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 07520000000003091686. by R. Adam Lauridsen (Lauridsen, Robert)

Download PDF
Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al (Revised 06/08) Doc. 204 United States District Court Northern District of Illinois MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Case Title: VULCAN GOLF, LLC, et aL. VS. Plantiff( s) GOOGLE, INC., et aL. Case Number: 07-CV-3371 Defendant( s) Judge: Hon. Blanche M. Manning I, R. Adam Lauridsen hereby apply to the Court under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and paricipate in the above-entitled action on behalf of Google, Inc. by whom I have been retained. I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts: Title of Cour Date Admitted 12/31/2007 Californa State Cours United States District Cour, Northern District of California 01/08/2008 01/17/2008 ünited States District Court, Eastern District of CaĚIfornia I have curently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this Date of Application (Granted or Denied)* Cour in the following actions: Case Number N/A Case Title *If denied, please explain: (Attach additional form if necessar) Pursuant to Local Rule 83.IS(a), applicants who do not have an offce within the Northern District of time of fiing their initial notice or pleading, a member of the bar of Ilinois must designate, at the this Court having an offce within this District upon who service of papers may be made. Has the applicant designated local counsel? Yes ~. If No C Dockets.Justia.com you have not designated local counsel, Local Rule 83.lS(b) provides that the designation must be made within thir (30) days. Has the applicant ever been: censured, suspended, disbarred, or witherwise disciplined by any court? or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the Yes C C No (e applicant's professional conduct? Yes No (e transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the bar of nay court? Yes C C No No No (e (e (e denied admission to the bar of any court? held in contempt of court? NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of Yes Yes r the incident(s) and the applicant's current status before any cour, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations of the applicant's conduct may have been instituted. I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of Ilinois, effective November 12, i 99 i (Local Rules 83.50 through 83.58), and the Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, effective December is, 1992, and wil faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tre and correct. Sep 8, 2008 Date Last Name S/ R. Adam Lauridsen Electronic Signature of Applicant First Name Middle Name/Initial Applicant's Name Lauridsen R. Adam Applicant's Law Fir Keker & Van Nest, LLP Street Address Room/Suite Number Applicant's Address 710 Sansome Street City San Francisco State ZIP Code 941 1 1 Work Phone Number CA 415-391-5400 (The pro hac vice admission fee is $100.00 for cases fied before February 1,2001, and $50.00 for cases fied on or after that date, and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective unti such time as the fee has been paid.) NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider fiing a petition for admission to the general bar of the Court. The fee for admission to the General Bar is $100.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $100.00 for cases fied before Februar i, 200 i, and $SO.OO for cases fied on or after that date. Admission to the general bar permits an attorney to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application for such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?