Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,

Filing 12

MOTION by Plaintiff Illinois Computer Research, LLC for extension of time For Google to Answer (Agreed) (Megley, Richard)

Download PDF
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc. Doc. 12 Case 1:07-cv-05081 Document 12 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ILLINOIS COMPUTER RESEARCH, LLC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) Case No. 07 C 5081 Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Mag. Judge Maria Valdez AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR GOOGLE TO ANSWER Defendant, Google Inc., respectfully requests a forty-five (45) day extension of time to answer plaintiff's complaint. Google has been served with plaintiff's complaint and summons. With the forty-five day extension, Google's answer would be due on or before November 15, 2007. Plaintiff does not object to the extension, and at the request of Google and in the spirit of cooperation, has agreed to file this agreed motion on Google's behalf because Google has yet to secure local counsel in this case. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard B. Megley, Jr. Raymond P. Niro Richard B. Megley, Jr. Karen L. Blouin Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602-4515 (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Illinois Computer Research, LLC Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-05081 Document 12 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR GOOGLE TO ANSWER was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF system. In addition, the undersigned is serving the following attorney by electronic mail: Michael S. Kwun Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 mkwun@google.com Counsel for Google Inc. on September 26, 2007. /s/ Richard B. Megley, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?