Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,
Filing
177
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Defendants motion for leave to file a sur-reply (169) is granted. Plaintiffs motion to remove and refile Exhibit A (152) is granted. Plaintiffs motion to compel (146) entered and continued pending in camera review of the challenged documents; Defendant agrees to produce those documents for the courts review by Wednesday, May 28, 2008. Discovery close date of September 30, 2008 stands, but the date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to August 15, 2008 for initial expert disclosure; date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure for responsive experts is extended to September 15, 2008. Date for filing amended pleadings is extended to June 30, 2008. Mailed notice (mb, )
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc.
Order Form (01/2005)
Doc. 177
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge
Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 07 C 5081
Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
DATE
5/23/2008
Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson
Defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply (169) is granted. Plaintiffs' motion to remove and refile Exhibit A (152) is granted. Plaintiff's motion to compel (146) entered and continued pending in camera review of the challenged documents; Defendant agrees to produce those documents for the court's review by Wednesday, May 28, 2008. Discovery close date of September 30, 2008 stands, but the date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to August 15, 2008 for initial expert disclosure; date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure for responsive experts is extended to September 15, 2008. Date for filing amended pleadings is extended to June 30, 2008.
Docketing to mail notices.
00:51
Courtroom Deputy Initials:
ETV
07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson
Page 1 of 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?