Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,

Filing 177

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Defendants motion for leave to file a sur-reply (169) is granted. Plaintiffs motion to remove and refile Exhibit A (152) is granted. Plaintiffs motion to compel (146) entered and continued pending in camera review of the challenged documents; Defendant agrees to produce those documents for the courts review by Wednesday, May 28, 2008. Discovery close date of September 30, 2008 stands, but the date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to August 15, 2008 for initial expert disclosure; date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure for responsive experts is extended to September 15, 2008. Date for filing amended pleadings is extended to June 30, 2008. Mailed notice (mb, )

Download PDF
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc. Order Form (01/2005) Doc. 177 United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 07 C 5081 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT DATE 5/23/2008 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson Defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply (169) is granted. Plaintiffs' motion to remove and refile Exhibit A (152) is granted. Plaintiff's motion to compel (146) entered and continued pending in camera review of the challenged documents; Defendant agrees to produce those documents for the court's review by Wednesday, May 28, 2008. Discovery close date of September 30, 2008 stands, but the date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to August 15, 2008 for initial expert disclosure; date for Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure for responsive experts is extended to September 15, 2008. Date for filing amended pleadings is extended to June 30, 2008. Docketing to mail notices. 00:51 Courtroom Deputy Initials: ETV 07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?