Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,

Filing 58

MINUTE entry before Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer :Rule 16 conference convened. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to be made by 12/14/2007. All discovery to be completed by 9/30/2008. Retained expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2): For all issues on which a party bears the burden of proof by 6/30/2008; rebuttal reports by 8/15/2008. Parties allowed to join additional parties and to amend pleadings by 3/31/2008. Parties have leave to take up to 15 depositions per side without further leave of court. Dispositive motions due by 10/31/2008. ICR and Harris to prepare proposed PTO draft by 1/30/2008; Joint Final Pretrial Order by 2/27/2009. Status hearing set for 2/5/2008 at 9:00. Mailed notice (etv, )

Download PDF
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc. Order Form (01/2005) Doc. 58 Case 1:07-cv-05081 Document 58 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 1 United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 07 C 5081 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT DATE 12/3/2007 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Google Inc. Rule 16 conference convened. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to be made by 12/14/2007. All discovery to be completed by 9/30/2008. Retained expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2): For all issues on which a party bears the burden of proof by 6/30/2008; rebuttal reports by 8/15/2008. Parties allowed to join additional parties and to amend pleadings by 3/31/2008. Parties have leave to take up to 15 depositions per side without further leave of court. Dispositive motions due by 10/31/2008. ICR and Harris to prepare proposed PTO draft by 1/30/2008; Joint Final Pretrial Order by 2/27/2009. Status hearing set for 2/5/2008 at 9:00. Docketing to mail notices. 00:09 Courtroom Deputy Initials: ETV 07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Google Inc. Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?