Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,
Filing
58
MINUTE entry before Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer :Rule 16 conference convened. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to be made by 12/14/2007. All discovery to be completed by 9/30/2008. Retained expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2): For all issues on which a party bears the burden of proof by 6/30/2008; rebuttal reports by 8/15/2008. Parties allowed to join additional parties and to amend pleadings by 3/31/2008. Parties have leave to take up to 15 depositions per side without further leave of court. Dispositive motions due by 10/31/2008. ICR and Harris to prepare proposed PTO draft by 1/30/2008; Joint Final Pretrial Order by 2/27/2009. Status hearing set for 2/5/2008 at 9:00. Mailed notice (etv, )
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc.
Order Form (01/2005)
Doc. 58
Case 1:07-cv-05081
Document 58
Filed 12/03/2007
Page 1 of 1
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge
Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 07 C 5081
Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
DATE
12/3/2007
Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Google Inc.
Rule 16 conference convened. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to be made by 12/14/2007. All discovery to be completed by 9/30/2008. Retained expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2): For all issues on which a party bears the burden of proof by 6/30/2008; rebuttal reports by 8/15/2008. Parties allowed to join additional parties and to amend pleadings by 3/31/2008. Parties have leave to take up to 15 depositions per side without further leave of court. Dispositive motions due by 10/31/2008. ICR and Harris to prepare proposed PTO draft by 1/30/2008; Joint Final Pretrial Order by 2/27/2009. Status hearing set for 2/5/2008 at 9:00.
Docketing to mail notices.
00:09
Courtroom Deputy Initials:
ETV
07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Google Inc.
Page 1 of 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?