Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson, et al,

Filing 80

MINUTE entry before Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : Discovery conference convened. Motion to compel #61 granted in part and denied in part. Mr. Harriss cross motion to compel #69 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs motion for a protective order regarding privileged e-mail #72 entered and continued for further response on 1/8/2008. Date for Plaintiffs response to Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings #49 extended to 1/3/2008. Parties to advise the court no later than 1/3/2008 of a proposed protocol for mediation of this dispute. Mailed notice (mb, )

Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc.
Order Form (01/2005)

Doc. 80

Case 1:07-cv-05081

Document 80

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 1

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 07 C 5081

Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

DATE

12/21/2007

Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson, P.C., et al

Discovery conference convened. Motion to compel [61] granted in part and denied in part. Mr. Harris's cross motion to compel [69] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's motion for a protective order regarding privileged e-mail [72] entered and continued for further response on 1/8/2008. Date for Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [49] extended to 1/3/2008. Parties to advise the court no later than 1/3/2008 of a proposed protocol for mediation of this dispute.

O[ For further details see text below.]
1:37

Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT Discovery conference convened. Motion to compel [61] is granted in part and denied in part: By agreement, Harris will produce all communications relating to possible infringement of the Harris patents, if those communications were created while Harris was at Fish & Richardson, other than communications that are subject to the attorney-client privilege. Fish & Richardson will thereafter identify which of the targets or potential targets are Fish clients. Harris will furnish the date on which his attorney/client relationship with the Niro firm began. In addition, Harris will provide unredacted agreements between Mr. Harris and his assignees. If review of those documents does not provide necessary information, Fish & Richardson will have leave to renew this motion. Mr. Harris's cross motion to compel [69] is granted in part and denied in part. Fish & Richardson agrees to disclose any communications from the firm's counsel to Mr. Harris himself. Plaintiff's motion for protective order [72] entered and continued for further response on 1/8/2008. Date for Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [29] extended to 1/3/2008. Parties to advise the court no later than 1/3/2008 of a proposed protocol for mediation of this dispute.
Courtroom Deputy Initials: ETV

07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson, P.C., et al

Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com