Thomas v. Coleman et al

Filing 67

MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 2/10/2009:Mailed notice(srn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DWIGHT THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PERCY COLEMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 07 C 6798 MEMORANDUM ORDER This 42 U.S.C. §1983 ("Section 1983") action, originally filed pro se by Dwight Thomas ("Thomas"),1 took quite some time to get all of the named defendants served and in place. When that was done and defendants thereafter filed their Answer to Thomas' Amended Complaint,2 this Court issued a sua sponte January 26, 2009 memorandum order directing defendants to flesh out their second Affirmative Defense--a contention that Thomas had failed to exhaust all available administrative remedies, which 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a) makes a precondition to filing his suit. In response defendants have just filed their Memorandum of Law in Support of Their [sic] Failure To Exhaust Affirmative Defense, which spells out in detail the grievance procedures Last year this Court appointed trial bar member Andrew Campbell, Esq. to represent Thomas pro bono publico. Before the Answer was filed this Court had rejected out of hand an ill-considered Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss that defendants had submitted. 2 1 established by the Illinois Department of Corrections ("Department") and reflects that a search of Department's records had revealed no effort by Thomas to pursue such remedies. From that submission it would seem most likely that no added discovery may be called for to address defendants' motion, but this memorandum order is also issued sua sponte to draw the attention of attorney Campbell as well as defense counsel to their need to be prepared to discuss the subject at the forthcoming February 17, 2009 status hearing. ________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: February 10, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?