Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 25

NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of motion to stay 23 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/5/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel)

Download PDF
Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc. Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LIMITNONE LLC, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Hon. Blanche Manning Case No. 08-cv-4178 Magistrate Judge Cox NOTICE OF MOTION Please take notice that on Tuesday, August 5, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Defendant Google Inc. shall appear before the Honorable Blanche Manning in Room 2125 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and present Google Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the Parties' Dispositive Motions, copies of which were previously served on Plaintiff LimitNone, LLC via this Court's CM/ECF Online filing system. DATED: July 30, 2008 Respectfully submitted, GOOGLE INC. By: /s/ Rachel M. Herrick One of Its Attorneys Michael T. Zeller (ARDC No. 6226433) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 443-3000 (213) 443-3100 (fax) Dockets.Justia.com Rachel M. Herrick (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 (650) 801-5000 (650) 801-5100 (fax) Jonathan M. Cyrluk (ARDC No. 6210250) STETLER & DUFFY, LTD 11 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 338-0200 (312) 338-0070 (fax) Attorneys for Google Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rachel M. Herrick, an attorney, certify under penalty of perjury that I caused a copy of the forgoing document to be served on all counsel of record via the Court's CM/ECF online filing system this 30th day of July, 2008. /s/ Rachel M. Herrick

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?