Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 53

NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of extension of time 52 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 10/7/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel)

Download PDF
Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc. Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LIMITNONE LLC, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-cv-04178 Hon. Blanche M. Manning NOTICE OF MOTION Please take notice that on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Defendant Google Inc. shall appear before the Honorable Blanche Manning in Room 2125 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and present Google Inc.'s Motion to Extend the Responsive Pleading Deadline, a copy of which has been previously served on Plaintiff LimitNone, LLC via this Court's CM/ECF Online filing system. DATED: October 2, 2008 Respectfully submitted, GOOGLE INC. By:_/s/ Rachel M. Herrick___________________ One of Its Attorneys Michael T. Zeller (ARDC No. 6226433) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 443-3000 (213) 443-3100 (fax) Rachel M. Herrick (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 22242/2654210.1 Dockets.Justia.com Redwood Shores, California 94065 (650) 801-5000 (650) 801-5100 (fax) Jonathan M. Cyrluk (ARDC No. 6210250) STETLER & DUFFY, LTD 11 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 338-0200 (312) 338-0070 (fax) Attorneys for Google Inc. 22242/2654210.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rachel M. Herrick, an attorney, certify under penalty of perjury that I caused a copy of the forgoing document to be served on all counsel of record via the Court's CM/ECF online filing system this 2nd day of October, 2008. /s/ Rachel M. Herrick Rachel M. Herrick 22242/2654210.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?