Mierzwa v. Astrue

Filing 26

MOTION by Defendant Michael Astrue for judgment Defendant's motion to enter judgment (Hunt, LaShonda)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA A. MIERZWA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 08 C 6390 Magistrate Judge Ashman DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT NOW COMES Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, and moves this Honorable Court to enter judgment, following the conclusion of proceedings pursuant to the Court’s remand under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), as further explained below. 1. On August 26, 2009, the court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation for remand under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Dkt. 20.) 2. The proceedings on remand have been concluded, and the Commissioner has awarded Plaintiff continuing disability benefits beginning December 2006. 3. As the Supreme Court has noted, “[i]mmediate entry of judgment (as opposed to entry of judgment after postremand agency proceedings have been completed and their results filed with the court) is in fact the principal feature that distinguishes a sentence-four remand from a sentence-six remand.” Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993). 4. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion. 5. Accordingly, the Commissioner respectfully moves the court to enter judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision. Respectfully submitted, GARY S. SHAPIRO Acting United States Attorney By: s/ LaShonda A. Hunt LASHONDA A. HUNT Assistant United States Attorney 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 886-4190 lashonda.hunt@usdoj.gov Of Counsel: GRACE M. KIM Acting Regional Chief Counsel Social Security Administration CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel 200 W. Adams, Suite 3000 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (877) 800-7578 charles.goldstein@ssa.gov 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?