Carradine v. Cortes et al
Filing
96
MOTION by Plaintiff Carolyn Carradine for judgment and Dismissal (Agreed) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Neslund, Jeffrey)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
CAROLYN CARRADINE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER JOSE
)
CORTES, STAR NO. 18443 and CHICAGO
)
POLICE OFFICER JOE MARTIN, STAR
)
NO. 7734, individually and as employee/Agents )
of the CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal
)
Corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No.: 08 C 6507
Judge Dow Jr.
Magistrate Judge Ashman
JURY DEMAND
Proposed JUDGEMENT ORDER
This matter comes before the Court for an agreed motion for Judgment and dismissal, the
plaintiff, CAROLYN CARRADINE, represented by and through her attorneys, JEFFREY J.
NESLUND and ROBERT ROBERTSON, and Defendants, CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER
JOSE CORTES, STAR NO. 18443 and CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER JOE MARTIN, STAR
NO. 7734, by their attorneys, SHNEUR NATHAN of Andrew M. Hale & Associates, LLC,
jointly request this Court enter an order for Judgment and dismissal and the Court, being fully
advised of the premises, hereby enters judgment as follows:
1. Judgment is entered in the amount of $215,000.00 in favor of Plaintiff in complete
and total satisfaction of the judgment previously entered on February 18, 2011; this
amount to be paid within 30 days of entry of this order;
2. The judgment entered in this case against Chicago Police Officer Jose Cortes is
satisfied upon receipt of the $215,000.00 to Plaintiff and Chicago Police Officer Jose Cortes
is hereby released and all claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
_____________________
Robert M. Dow
United States District Court Judge
Date:______________
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?