Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics Local No. 701 Pension and Welfare Funds v. Union Bank of California, N.A.
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/20/2009:Mailed notice(srn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TRUSTEES OF THE AUTOMOBILE MECHANICS LOCAL NO. 701 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, Plaintiff, v. UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No.
08 C 7217
MEMORANDUM ORDER In accordance with this Court's June 29, 2009 oral directive, Union Bank, N.A. f/k/a Union Bank of California, N.A. ("Union Bank") has filed its Answer and Amended Affirmative Defenses ("ADs") to this ERISA-based action brought against it by Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics Local No. 701 Pension and Welfare Funds ("Trustees"). connection with that filing. As this Court had directed, all ten of Union Bank's current ADs target Trustees in their collective capacity. Each is This memorandum order is issued in
fleshed out so that the reader is not left to guess what Union Bank means by simply parroting one of the grounds listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 8(c), thus serving the goal of notice pleading that applies in the federal system to plaintiffs and defendants alike. And given the provision of Rule 7(a) that
makes an answer (including ADs) the end of the pleading line unless the court orders otherwise, this Court finds that nothing
more is needed to put the case at issue.1 Finally, because the current filing supplants the ADs that were part of Union Bank's earlier Answer, Trustees' motion to strike those earlier ADs is rendered moot. therefore denied on that ground. That motion is
________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: July 20, 2009
This is not intended to preclude Trustees from challenging any of the ADs as legally or factually insufficient. 2
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?