Dart v. Craigslist, Inc.

Filing 37

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Grady: Craigslist to file a reply brief in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings (12) by 08/06/2009. Motions for leave to appear pro hac vice (24) (25) are denied without prejudice. Motion by defendant Craigslist, Inc. to strike appearance of nonparty (30) is denied without prejudice. Motion by unknown The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women for leave to appear as amicus curiae (32) is denied without prejudice. Motion by plaintiff Thomas Dart for joinder (35) is denied without prejudice. The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women is given leave to file a amicus brief not to exceed 15 pages including any attachment or exhibits by 08/06/2009.Mailed notice (vcf, )

Download PDF
Dart v. Craigslist, Inc. Order Form (01/2005) Doc. 37 United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge John F. Grady 09 C 1385 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT DATE Sheriff of Cook County vs. Craigslist Inc. 7/16/2009 Craigslist to file a reply brief in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings (12) by 08/06/2009. Motions for leave to appear pro hac vice (24) (25) are denied without prejudice. Motion by defendant Craigslist, Inc. to strike appearance of nonparty (30) is denied without prejudice. Motion by unknown The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women for leave to appear as amicus curiae (32) is denied without prejudice. Motion by plaintiff Thomas Dart for joinder (35) is denied without prejudice. The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women is given leave to file a amicus brief not to exceed 15 pages including any attachment or exhibits by 08/06/2009. Docketing to mail notices. 00:20 Courtroom Deputy Initials: JD 09C1385 Sheriff of Cook County vs. Craiglist Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?