Cleary et al v. Philip Morris, Incorporated et al

Filing 78

MOTION by Defendants Philip Morris, Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, American Tobacco Company, Inc., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. for judgment ON COUNT III OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Wagner, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BRIAN CLEARY and RITA BURKE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. Proposed Class Action PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. DEFENDANTS'1 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON COUNT III OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, American Tobacco Company, Inc., and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation hereby moves pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss Count III of Plaint iff's Third Amended Complaint with prejudice, and strike all related allegations (¶¶ 19, 282-295, 323, 325-27, 330, 354-363) from the Complaint based on the statute of limitations. As explained in the accompanying memorandum of law, Plaintiffs' lawsuit should be dismissed because it is barred by the statute of limitations, which expired for Plaintiffs' Lights claims in February 2007. First, Plaintiffs' Lights claims are based on an unjust enrichment theory and therefore subject to the five-year limitations period in 735 ILCS 5/13-205. See Burns Philp Food, Inc. v. Cavalea Cont'l. Freight, Inc., 135 F.3d 526, 528 (7th Cir. 1998); Hoang v. Abbott Labs., 2008 WL 4852973, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 6, 2008) (same). Further, this Court has already concluded that identical claims based on the marketing and sale of "Lights" cigarettes asserted 1 No. 09-cv-1596 Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly This brief is filed on behalf of defendants Philip Morris USA Inc. ("PM USA"), R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Amer ican Tobacco Company, Inc., and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. 1 against Lorillard in Count III of the Amended Complaint should be dismissed as time-barred and the Court's reasoning applies equally to the other defendants against whom these claims are made. Finally, Plaintiffs have previously withdrawn these same Lights-related allegations in their Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 1, Ex. D). Under Illinois law, "[w]hen a complaint is amended, without reference to the earlier allegations, it is expected that these allegations are no longer at issue" and deemed waived. Foxcroft Townhome Owners Ass'n. v. Hoffman Rosner Corp., 449 N.E.2d 125, 127 (Ill. 1983); see also Pfaff v. Chrysler Corp., 610 N.E.2d 51, 63 (Ill. 1993) ("allegat ions in a former complaint, not incorporated in the final amended complaint, are deemed waived"). Thus, for reasons more fully explained in Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion For Judgment on Count III of the Third Amended Complaint, Defendants respectfully request that this Court dismiss Count III of Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint with prejudice, and strike all related allegations (¶¶ 19, 282-295, 323, 325-27, 330, 354-363) from the Complaint. Dated: June 9, 2009 Respect fully submitted, PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. /s/ Jeffrey Wagner Jeffrey M. Wagner #06199166 (jwagner@winston.com) Kevin A. Banasik #06271012 WINSTON & STRAWN 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601-5600 Phone: (312) 558-5600 Fax: (312) 558-5700 Attorneys for Philip Morris USA Inc., Counsel for Tobacco Research U.S.A., 2 and Smokeless Tobacco Co. /s/ Karey Skiermont Karey Skiermont JONES DAY 77 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Attorneys for Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 9, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Christopher B. Essig ________________________ Dated: June 9, 2009 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?