Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 112

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order: This Court grants in part and denies in part defendants' Motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims against all defendants, other than Google, are dismissed without prejudice. The trademark infringement claim (Count I) brought by Plaintiffs' Specht and ADC is dismissed with prejudice for lack of standing. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint that provides supporting factual information of some specificity as to each individual defendant. [For further details see separate order(s). Mailed notices (gcy, )

Download PDF
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al Order Form (01/2005) Doc. 112 United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Harry D. Leinenweber 09 C 2572 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT DATE Erich Specht, et al vs. Google, Inc., et al 8/3/2009 ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: This Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants, other than Google, are dismissed without prejudice. The trademark infringement claim (Count I) brought by Plaintiffs' Specht and ADC is dismissed with prejudice for lack of standing. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint that provides supporting factual information of some specificity as to each individual defendant. O [ For further detail see separate order(s).] Docketing to mail notices. Courtroom Deputy Initials: WAP 09C2572 Erich Specht, et al vs. Google, Inc., et al Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?