Specht et al v. Google Inc et al
Filing
238
NOTICE of Motion by Herbert H. Finn for presentment of motion to clarify 237 before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/3/2010 at 09:30 AM. (Finn, Herbert)
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al
Doc. 238
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Cole
NOTICE OF MOTION TO: Martin J. Murphy (martym@villageinvestments.com) 2811 RFD Long Grove, IL 60047 P. Andrew Fleming (andrewf@novackmacey.com) John F. Shonkwiler (jshonkwiler@novackmacey.com) John B. Haarlow, Jr. (jhaarlow@novackmacey.com) NOVACK & MACEY 100 North Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, August 3, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned will appear before the Honorable Judge Leinenweber, or any Judge sitting in his stead, in Courtroom 1941, at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois and present GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING TIMING OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, a copy of which is being served on you herewith.
CHI 59,987,028v1 7-30-10
Dockets.Justia.com
Respectively submitted, Dated: July 30, 2010 /s Herbert H. Finn Herbert H. Finn (ARDC #6205685) Richard D. Harris (ARDC #1137913) Jeffrey P. Dunning (ARDC #6273364) Cameron M. Nelson (ARDC #6275585) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 456-8400 COUNSEL FOR GOOGLE INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the date set forth below, I electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE OF MOTION and GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING TIMING OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filings to all counsel of record.
Dated: July 30, 2010
/s Herbert H. Finn
CHI 59,987,028v1 7-30-10
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?