Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 282

MOTION by Defendant Google Inc for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for summary judgment 252 [Unopposed] (Finn, Herbert)

Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Doc. 282

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Cole

GOOGLE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant GOOGLE INC. ("Google"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby submits this unopposed motion for an extension of time in which to file its Reply (and associated documentation) in support of its pending Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion," Dkt. No. 252). In support of this Motion, Google states as follows: 1. On August 20, 2010, Google filed its Motion, seeking entry of summary judgment

in its favor on all counts of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint and Counts I and III of Google's counterclaims. On August 24, 2010, the Court set a briefing schedule on Google's Motion (Dkt. No. 259), under which Plaintiffs' response to Google's Motion was due by October 5, 2010, and Google's reply was due by October 26, 2010. 2. On September 30, 2010, the parties appeared before the Court for presentment of

Google's Motion to exclude certain documents and information not produced by Plaintiffs in a timely fashion (Dkt. No. 261). During that hearing, Plaintiffs requested an extension of time until October 8, 2010 in which to submit their Response to Google's Motion, which the Court granted (Dkt. No. 264). While the Court inquired at that time as to whether Google desired a corresponding extension of time in which to submit its reply, Google informed the Court that it did not believe such an extension would be necessary.

Dockets.Justia.com

3.

While Google had initially anticipated having its Reply ready by the originally set

October 26 deadline, additional time is required. Accordingly, Google respectfully requests four (4) additional business days in which to finalize and file its Reply (and associated documents), by November 1, 2010. 4. extension. WHEREFORE, Google respectfully requests that the Court extend the deadline for the submission of its Reply (and associated documentation) in Support of its Motion to November 1, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Plaintiffs, through counsel, has advised that they do not object to the requested

Dated: October 26, 2010

/s Herbert H. Finn Herbert H. Finn (ARDC #6205685) Richard D. Harris (ARDC #1137913) Jeffrey P. Dunning (ARDC #6273364) Cameron M. Nelson (ARDC #6275585) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100 Chicago, IL 60601 [phone] COUNSEL FOR GOOGLE INC.

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the date set forth below, I electronically filed the foregoing GOOGLE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filings to all counsel of record.

Dated: October 26, 2010

/s Herbert H. Finn

3