Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 338

NOTICE of Motion by Herbert H. Finn for presentment of motion for protective order 337 before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/12/2011 at 09:30 AM. (Finn, Herbert)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Cole NOTICE OF MOTION TO: Martin J. Murphy (martym@villageinvestments.com) 2811 RFD Long Grove, IL 60047 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, May 12, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned will appear before the Honorable Judge Leinenweber, or any Judge sitting in his stead, in Courtroom 1941, at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois and present GOOGLE INC.’S MOTION AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO DESTROY ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED/WORK PRODUCT IMMUNE INFORMATION INADVERTENTLY PRODUCED BY GOOGLE, a copy of which is being served on you herewith. CHI 61,026,090v1 5-9-11 Respectively submitted, Dated: May 9, 2011 /s Herbert H. Finn Herbert H. Finn (ARDC #6205685) Jeffrey P. Dunning (ARDC #6273364) Cameron M. Nelson (ARDC #6275585) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 456-8400 COUNSEL FOR GOOGLE INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the date set forth below, I electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE OF MOTION and GOOGLE INC.’S MOTION AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO DESTROY ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED/WORK PRODUCT IMMUNE INFORMATION INADVERTENTLY PRODUCED BY GOOGLE with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filings to all counsel of record. Dated: May 9, 2011 CHI 61,026,090v1 5-9-11 /s Herbert H. Finn 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?