Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 387

MOTION by Plaintiffs Andoid's Dungeon Incorporated, The, Android Data Corporation, Erich Specht for bond approval (Murphy, Martin)

Download PDF
Marty Murphy From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: FinnH@gtlaw.com Monday, October 31, 2011 1:55 PM martym@villageinvestments.com DunningJ@gtlaw.com Specht/Google pdf.pdf Mr. Murphy, The Court's Order (a copy of which is attached) is very clear "Plaintiffs' motion to stay enforcement is granted and will become effective upon posting of a supercedeas bond in the amount of $21,000." There is no calculations being done in the Court's Order. As you aptly point out, L.R. 65.1 permits a party to ask for a larger or smaller bond -- which is precisely what Google did. We asked for and obtained a bond in the amount of $21,000. We will leave it up to you and your client as to whether you will post the Court ordered bond (letter of credit) or have Google initiate enforcement efforts and potential freezing of your client's accounts. We hope that enforcement will not be necessary and that the appropriate letter of credit will be in place and filed by the end of the week. Herb Finn 1 Mr. Murphy, Please express our condolences to Mr. and Mrs. Specht and their family. As to posting a letter of credit, we do not agree to the amount you calculated. The Court ordered the bond in the amount of $21,000. As such, we believe the proper calculation to be: Bond Ordered Reserve for costs per L.R. 62.1 Interest per 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 Weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield w/e 10/21/2011 at 0.12% Total Amount of letter of credit should be: $ 21,000 $ 500 $25.20 $21,525.20 We look forward to receiving confirmation of posting in the amount of $21,525.20, by next Thursday as indicated. Herb Finn 2 Mr. Murphy, As Judge Leineweber has not denied Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate his awarding of costs, and in view of the months that Plaintiffs have had to comply with the Court's prior orders to either pay the awarded costs or to post the appropriate bond with the Clerk, we reiterate our request that you confirm compliance. If we do not receive either payment or confirmation (including copies of the filed documentation) that bond has been posted with the Clerk by Monday, October 31, we have been instructed to proceed with enforcement of the Court's Order. Herb Finn 3 Mr. Murphy, Please confirm that you have complied with Judge Leinenweber's August 17, 2011 Order and that Plaintiffs have posted the requisite bond with the Clerk of the District Court. Your early provision of copies of the check and any associated documents submitted to or received from the Clerk is appreciated. Herb Finn 4 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?