Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 77

NOTICE of Motion by Herbert H. Finn for presentment of motion to stay, 74 before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/25/2009 at 09:30 AM. (Finn, Herbert)

Download PDF
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al Doc. 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Cole NOTICE OF MOTION TO: Martin J. Murphy, Attorney at Law 2811 RFD Long Grove, IL 60047 martym@villageinvestments.com PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, June 25, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned will appear before the Honorable Judge Leinenweber, or any Judge sitting in his stead, in Courtroom 1941, at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois and present the UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS being filed by Defendants HTC CORPORATION; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC; SYNAPTICS, INC.; QUALCOMM INC.; AKM SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; ASCENDER CORP.; INTEL CORP.; MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; AUDIENCE, INC.; and BROADCOM CORP., a copy of which is being served upon you herewith. Dockets.Justia.com Respectively submitted, Dated: June 22, 2009 /s Herbert H. Finn Herbert H. Finn (ARDC #6205685) Richard D. Harris (ARDC #1137913) Jeffrey P. Dunning (ARDC #6273364) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 456-8400 COUNSEL FOR THE MOVING DEFENDANTS 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the date set forth below, I electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE OF MOTION and STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY DEADLINES FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filings to all counsel of record. Dated: June 22, 2009 /s Herbert H. Finn 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?