Bank of America, N.A. v. Knight Quartz Flooring LLC (f/k/a Knight Industries Premium Flooring LLC)
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/2/2009:Mailed notice(srn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KNIGHT QUARTZ FLOORING, LLC, etc., ) ) Defendant. )
No.
09 C 4845
MEMORANDUM ORDER This Court has just received its chambers copy of the motion by newly retained counsel for defendant Knight Quartz Flooring, LLC ("Knight Quartz"), which has set for presentment on September 8 a request to extend the time for filing a responsive pleading to the Complaint brought against Knight Quartz by Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank of America"). Because Knight Quartz was
served with process on August 11, the outside due date for its response fell the day before yesterday (August 31). Although this Court typically grants motions for extensions of time almost without exception (and it also ordinarily expects opposing counsel to agree to such requests as a matter of courtesy), there are situations that do not call for such a response from opposing counsel or from the court. In this
instance Bank of America is suing on an assertedly delinquent $1.3 million secured note delivered in connection with a revolving credit facility, and there is no conceivable justification for Knight Quartz's failure to seek out and retain
counsel on such a serious matter until the actual August 31 date on which its responsive pleading was due. Moreover, this Court's
review of the Complaint discloses no predicate for requesting anything beyond an extremely modest amount of time for counsel to prepare and file the requisite pleading:1 1. Complaint ¶2 sets out the jurisdictional Those
information about Knight Quartz and its members.
allegations speak to facts that by definition are within the knowledge of Knight Quartz's principals and can readily be conveyed to its counsel. 2. All aspects of the loan transaction and the loan
documents, spelled out in detail in the Complaint, are also readily verifiable. And relatedly, the comprehensive
exhibits attached to the Complaint provide detailed support for Bank of America's allegations. Under the circumstances, the 14-day extension offered by Bank of America's counsel is entirely reasonable. Knight Quartz
is granted until September 15, 2009 to file its responsive pleading, and the previously-scheduled September 25 status
Needless to say, this Court ascribes no fault to Knight Quartz's newly retained counsel, and it recognizes that the need to act quickly places pressure on those lawyers, who are not at all at fault. But it is not callous or inconsiderate to say that such pressure comes with the territory--it's an unavoidable part of being a good and responsible lawyer. 2
1
hearing date remains in effect.
________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: September 2, 2009
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?