Howell v. AT&T Mobility LLC.

Filing 7

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of Illinois. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Jeffery N. Luthi on 4/28/10. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 5/4/2010.]

Download PDF
Judge St. Eve Magistrate Mason 10cv2668 wah Filed 4/28/10 By Jakeia R. Mells on Apr 28, 2010 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Apr 13, 2010 IN RE: AT&T MOBILITY WIRELESS DATA SERVICES SALES TAX LITIGATION MDL No. 2147 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) On April 7, 2010, the Panel transferred 28 civil actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See ___F.Supp.2d___ (J.P.M.L. 2010). With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve. It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to Judge St. Eve. Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of April 7, 2010, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 14 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 14-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Apr 28, 2010 ___________________________ Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel A TRUE COPY-ATTEST MICHAEL W. DOBBINS, CLERK By s/ LAKISHA C. WILLIAMS DEPUTY CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DATE: APRIL 30, 2010 Page 1 of 2 IN RE: AT&T MOBILITY WIRELESS DATA SERVICES SALES TAX LITIGATION MDL No. 2147 SCHEDULE CTO-1 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST. DIV. C.A. # ARIZONA AZ 2 CASE CAPTION 10-177 Kirk Tushaus v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2665) CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 10-791 CAC 2 10-1363 John Simon, et al. v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2666) Krista M. Kyle v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2667) CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 10-564 Maurice Howell v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2668) CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 10-184 Donald Sipple v. AT&T, Inc., et al. (10cv2669) CAS 3 10-533 Audrey Wright v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2670) CONNECTICUT CT 3 10-41 FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 10-147 FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 0 10-60161 LOUISIANA EASTERN LAE 2 10-705 LOUISIANA MIDDLE LAM 3 10-177 MARYLAND MD 1 10-173 MD 1 10-192 MINNESOTA MN 0 10-228 David Rock v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2671) Janine R. Novick v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2672) Frank Bulzone v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2673) Jennifer L. Crose v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2674) Mark Erie, Sr., et al. v. AT&T, Inc., et al. (10cv2676) Candice Dow v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2678) Bonnae Meshulam v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2679) Aaron White v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2680) Page 2 of 2 MDL No. 2147 - Schedule CTO-1 Tag-Along Actions (Continued) DIST. DIV. C.A. # MISSOURI WESTERN MOW 4 10-161 CASE CAPTION William Matthew Leisman v. AT&T, Inc., et al. (10cv2681) NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN NCW 3 10-20 Stephen S. Girard v. AT&T Mobility LLC UTAH UT (10cv2682) 2 10-63 Steven A. Devore v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. (10cv2683) James K.S. Stewart v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2684) (10cv2685) VIRGINIA EASTERN VAE 1 10-72 VERMONT VT 2 10-26 William J. Rogers v. AT&T Mobility LLC WASHINGTON WESTERN WAW 2 10-257 Matthew J. Vickery v. AT&T Mobility LLC (10cv2686) WISCONSIN EASTERN WIE 2 10-125 (10cv2687) Anne Stanczak v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?