Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Noel Ramos Construction Co., Inc.

Filing 23

MOTION by Plaintiffs Steven M Cisco, Angelo A, DiPaolo, Marshall Douglas, David Fagan, John E Kenny, Jr., Mike Larson, Local 150, I.U.O.E. Vacation Savings Plan, James McNally, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Midwest Operating Enginee rs Retirement Enhancement Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund, Mike Piraino, Daniel R Plote, David Rock, David Snelten, James M Sweeney, Martin Turek, Glen Weeks for judgment /prove-up (Scanlon, Cecilia)

Download PDF
Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Noel Ramos Construction Co., Inc. Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JAMES M. SWEENEY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. NOEL RAMOS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., an Illinois corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10 C 2786 JUDGE SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN MOTION FOR PROVE-UP Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, default having been entered against the Defendant on June 15, 2010, request this Court enter judgment against Defendant, NOEL RAMOS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., an Illinois corporation. In support of its Motion, Plaintiffs state: 1. On June 15, 2010, this Court entered default against Defendant and granted Plaintiffs' motion for an order directing Defendant to turn over its monthly fringe benefit (non-bargaining) contribution reports for February 2010 forward. The Court also entered an order that judgment would be entered after Defendant submitted the required reports and Plaintiffs determined the amount due and owing from Defendant. 2. On September 20, 2010, Defendant submitted its monthly fringe benefit (non-bargaining) contribution reports for February 2010 through September 2010. Based on these reports, and prior reports submitted by Defendant, Defendant is delinquent in contributions to the Funds for the months of October 2009 through May 2010 in the amount of $97,170.24. (See Affidavit of David S. Bodley). 3. Defendant has received a credit of $5,255.00 toward amounts due and owing. Dockets.Justia.com 4. Additionally, the amount of $9,388.83 is due for liquidated damages for the months of August 2009 through May 2010. (Bodley Aff. Par. 5). 5. In addition, Plaintiffs' firm has expended $435.00 in costs and $2,380.00 in reasonable attorneys' fees in this matter. (See Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman). 6. Based upon the documents attached hereto, Plaintiffs request entry of judgment in the total amount of $104,119.08. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter judgment in the amount of $104,119.08. /s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon Cecilia M. Scanlon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6288574 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: cscanlon@baumsigman.com I:\MOEJ\Ramos, Noel Construction\motion-judgment.cms.df.wpd ­2­ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the foregoing document (Motion for Prove-Up) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following non-CM/ECF participants on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 1st day of October 2010: Mr. Noel Ramos, Registered Agent/President Noel Ramos Construction Co., Inc. 143 Paramount Wood Dale, IL 60191 /s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon Cecilia M. Scanlon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6288574 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: cscanlon@baumsigman.com I:\MOEJ\Ramos, Noel Construction\motion-judgment.cms.df.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?