Coach, Inc. et al v. City of Chicago et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/16/2010:Mailed notice(srn, )

Download PDF
Coach, Inc. et al v. City of Chicago et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COACH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, etc., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 10 C 3108 MEMORANDUM Jam Entertainment and Creative Services, LLC ("Jam") has filed its Answer to the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") brought against it and a number of codefendants by Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (collectively "Coach," treated for convenience as a singular noun). This sua sponte memorandum has been triggered by Jam's nearly-all-pervasive use of the disclaimer made available by Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 8(b)(5) as an alternative to either admitting or denying a complaint's allegations. First, however, one thing that the responsive pleading has highlighted is the inadequacy of the FAC to invoke the diversity branch of federal subject matter jurisdiction as an alternative to what appears to be plainly available federal-question jurisdiction. Under the circumstances this memorandum need not detail the several deficiencies in that respect--suffice it to say that the belt-and-suspenders approach employed by Coach in referring to diversity jurisdiction will simply be ignored unless and until the federal-question predicates for jurisdiction might Dockets.Justia.com fall away. That said, this Court must say that it is bemused by some of Jam's disclaimers. If it is truly unaware of Coach's products and presence in the marketplace to the extent stated in many of the disclaimers, it (or its counsel, or both) must live an extraordinarily hermit-like existence. That, however, will not be used as the basis for sending counsel back to the drawing board--hence this is captioned as a "memorandum" rather than a "memorandum order." ________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: September 16, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?