Masonry Institute et al v. LMG Masonry, Inc.
Filing
8
MOTION by Plaintiffs Bricklayers Local 21 Pension Fund, Bricklayers Local 21 of Illinois Apprenticeship and Training Program, Bricklayers and Stone Masons of Illinois District Council No. 1 B.A.C. Annuity Trust Fund, District Council Training Center Fund, Masonry Institute for judgment entry, MOTION by Plaintiffs Bricklayers Local 21 Pension Fund, Bricklayers Local 21 of Illinois Apprenticeship and Training Program, Bricklayers and Stone Masons of Illinois District Council No. 1 B.A.C. An nuity Trust Fund, District Council Training Center Fund, Masonry Institute to reopen case, MOTION by Plaintiffs Bricklayers Local 21 Pension Fund, Bricklayers Local 21 of Illinois Apprenticeship and Training Program, Bricklayers and Stone Masons of I llinois District Council No. 1 B.A.C. Annuity Trust Fund, District Council Training Center Fund, Masonry Institute to vacate Order of Dismissal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Agreed Order of Dismissal, # 2 Exhibit B, Settlement Agreement)(Greenberg, Robert)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
MASONRY INSTITUTE, BRICKLAYERS
LOCAL 21 PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS
LOCAL 21 OF ILLINOIS APPRENTICESHIP
AND TRAINING PROGRAM, AND BRICKLAYERS AND STONE MASONS OF ILLINOIS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 1 B.A.C.
ANNUITY TRUST FUND,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LMG MASONRY, INC., an Illinois Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:10-cv-3424
Judge St. Eve
Magistrate Judge Brown
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF DISMISSAL, TO REINSTATE ACTION,
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
NOW COME the Plaintiffs and moves this Honorable Court to vacate Order of
Dismissal entered on July 20, 2010, a copy of which is attached hereto as Plaintiffs' Exhibit
"A", and to reinstate Plaintiffs' cause of action instanter, and for entry of judgment against
the Defendant.
In support of Plaintiffs' Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:
1)
That pursuant to Settlement Agreement executed by the parties, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Plaintiffs’ Exhibit “B”, the parties agreed to a dismissal of the
pending action.
2)
That notwithstanding the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, speci-
fically paragraph 1 thereof, the Defendant has failed to remit payments for the months of
March, April, May and June 2011.
WHEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement,
Exhibit “B”, Plaintiffs pray that the Order of Dismissal be vacated instanter, Plaintiffs’
cause of action be reinstated, and that judgment enter in favor of Plaintiffs and against the
Defendant in the amount of $6,788.34, as and for the outstanding delinquencies and
accrued interest calculated pursuant to the Judgment Order, which amount does not
include current delinquencies claimed due, if any.
That Plaintiffs also pray that judgment enter for Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs
incurred as a result of the Defendant’s non-compliance with the provisions of the parties’
Settlement Agreement.
/s/ Robert B. Greenberg
Asher, Gittler & D'Alba, Ltd.
200 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1900
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(312) 263-1500
Fax: (312) 263-1520
rbg@ulaw.com
IL ARDC#: 01047558
Dated: July 8, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?