Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. Apex Custom Stair Builders, Incorporated
Filing
12
MOTION by Plaintiffs Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois, Michael T Kucharski for judgment entry (Alfon, Beverly)
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. Apex Custom Stair Builders, Incorporated
Doc. 12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CARPENTERS FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS OF ILLINOIS, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) APEX CUSTOM STAIR BUILDERS, ) INCORPORATED, an Illinois corporation, ) ) Defendant. )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10 C 3588 JUDGE VIRGINIA M. KENDALL
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, default having been entered against the Defendant on August 24, 2010, request this Court enter judgment against Defendant, APEX CUSTOM STAIR BUILDERS, INCORPORATED, an Illinois corporation. In support of that Motion, Plaintiffs state: 1. On August 24, 2010, this Court entered default against Defendant and granted
Plaintiffs' request for an order directing Defendant to submit its monthly fringe benefit contribution reports for May 2010 through July 2010. The Court also entered an order that judgment would be entered after Plaintiffs received the reports and determined the amount due and owing from Defendant. 2. On September 8, 2010, pursuant to this Court's order, Defendant submitted monthly
fringe benefit contribution reports to the Funds for May 2010 through July 2010, each indicating no contributions due for that period. Nonetheless, on contribution reports that Defendant submitted for the time period June 2009 through October 2009, January 2010 and February 2010, Defendant acknowledges contributions due to the Funds in the amount of $10,276.31. (See Affidavit of Deborah L. French).
Dockets.Justia.com
3.
Additionally, the amount of $1,027.63 is due for liquidated damages for the above-
stated period of time. (French Aff. ¶ 4(b)). 4. Pursuant to the Trust Agreements, a liquidated damages surcharge has been assessed
against the Defendant in the amount of one and one-half (1.5%) percent of the total contributions untimely received, compounded monthly at one and one-half (1.5%) percent, for the period accrued through August 31, 2010, in the total amount of $919.51. 5. In addition, Plaintiffs' firm has expended the total amount of $435.00 for costs and
$1,522.50 in reasonable attorneys' fees in this matter. (See Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman). 6. Based upon the documents attached hereto, Plaintiffs request entry of judgment in
the total amount of $14,180.95. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter judgment in the amount of $14,180.95.
/s/ Beverly P. Alfon Beverly P. Alfon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6274459 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: balfon@baumsigman.com
I:\CarpsJ\Apex Custom Stair\motion-judgment.bpa.df.wpd
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the foregoing document (Motion for Entry of Judgment) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 21st day of September 2010: Illinois Lawdock, Inc., Registered Agent Apex Custom Stair Builders, Incorporated 300 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60654 Mr. Christopher J. Enders, President Apex Custom Stair Builders, Incorporated 1605 Division Street Mendota, IL 61342
/s/ Beverly P. Alfon
Beverly P. Alfon Attorney for Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606-5231 Bar No.: 6274459 Telephone: (312) 236-4316 Facsimile: (312) 236-0241 E-Mail: balfon@baumsigman.com
I:\CarpsJ\Apex Custom Stair\motion-judgment.bpa.df.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?