Huon v. Breaking Media et al

Filing 62

MOTION by Defendants Nick Denton, Gabby Darbyshire, Irin Carmon, Gawker Media, Jezebel.com to dismiss Notice of Motion to Dismiss (Giskan, Oren)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -against) ) ABOVETHELAW.COM, DAVID LAT, ELIE ) MYSTAL, BREAKINGMEDIA.COM, JOHN ) LERNER, DAVID MINKIN, BREAKING MEDIA,) JOHN DOES 1 TO 100, GAWKER MEDIA A/K/A ) GAWKER.COM, JEZEBEL.COM, NICK ) DENTON, IRIN CARMON, GABY ) DARBYSHIRE, JOHN DOES 101 TO 200, ) LAWYERGOSSIP.COM, JOHN DOE NO. 201, ) NEWNATION.ORG A/K/A NEWNATION.TV ) A/K/A NEW NATION NEWS, JOHN DOE NO. ) 401, JOHN DOE NO. 402, JOHN DOE NO. 403, ) ) Defendants ) ) MEANITH HUON, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-CV-3054 (MEA JTG) NOTICE OF MOTION To: Counsel of Record. Please take notice that on November 10, 2011 at 10:30 a.m., I shall appear before the Honorable Judge Marvin Aspen in the courtroom usually occupied by by him in Room 2568 of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present GAWKER DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 12(B)(6), 735 ILCS 110/5, 47 U.S.C 230, AND 805 ILCS 180/10-10. Dated: New York, New York October 3, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, GAWKER MEDIA A/K/A GAWKER.COM, JEZEBEL.COM, NICK DENTON, IRIN CARMON & GABY DARBYSHIRE, By: ____/S/ Oren Giskan________ One of their attorneys Oren S. Giskan GISKAN SOLOTAROFF ANDERSON & STEWART LLP 11 Broadway, Suite 2150 New York, NY 10004 T: 212.847-8315 F: 646.520.3235 ogiskan@gslawny.com Cc: David Feige GISKAN SOLOTAROFF ANDERSON & STEWART LLP 11 Broadway, Suite 2150 New York, NY 10004 T: 212.847-8315 F: 646.520.3235 David@DavidFeige.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?