Huon v. Breaking Media et al

Filing 77

MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: On 10/12/11, the Court entered an order granting Plaintiff's amended motion to strike 50 Exhibit B (a trial transcript) attached to Defendant Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum In Support Of its Motion To Dismiss which, in turn, was attached to Defendant's Motion For Leave To File Brief In Excess of 15 Pages filed on 9/21/11 36 . On 9/26/11, the District Judge granted Defendant's motion for leave to file the oversize memorandum and Defendant filed that memorandum on the same date in accordance with the Court's order with the offending transcript attached 49 . Plaintiff now has brought to the attention of the Court's courtroom deputy that the offending transcript is still on the CM/ECF system as Exhibit 2 to Defendant Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss as filed on 9/26/11 49 . Although Plaintiff's amended motion to strike 50 did not reference the offending transcript in Docket Entry 49 as well as Docket Entry 36 , the Court now directs the Clerk to remove from the CM/ECF system Exhibit B to Defendant Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss 49 for the same reasons stated in the Court's order of 10/12/11. Mailed notice (ep, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2
Eastern Division
Meanith Huon
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.: 1:11−cv−03054
Honorable Marvin E. Aspen

Breaking Media, et al.
Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, November 2, 2011:
MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: On 10/12/11, the Court
entered an order granting Plaintiff's amended motion to strike [50] Exhibit B (a trial
transcript) attached to Defendant Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum In Support Of its
Motion To Dismiss which, in turn, was attached to Defendant's Motion For Leave To File
Brief In Excess of 15 Pages filed on 9/21/11 [36]. On 9/26/11, the District Judge granted
Defendant's motion for leave to file the oversize memorandum and Defendant filed that
memorandum on the same date in accordance with the Court's order with the offending
transcript attached [49]. Plaintiff now has brought to the attention of the Court's courtroom
deputy that the offending transcript is still on the CM/ECF system as Exhibit 2 to
Defendant Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss as filed
on 9/26/11 [49]. Although Plaintiff's amended motion to strike [50] did not reference the
offending transcript in Docket Entry [49] as well as Docket Entry [36], the Court now
directs the Clerk to remove from the CM/ECF system Exhibit B to Defendant
Abovethelaw.com's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss [49] for the same
reasons stated in the Court's order of 10/12/11. Mailed notice(ep, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was
generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and
criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please
refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our
web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.