Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 112

MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Motion hearing held. Plaintiffs' motion to compel comScore, Inc. to respond to written discovery 104 is granted in part and denied in part. For the reasons stated in open court, the motion is granted to the extent that Defendant must conduct an exhaustive search to complete its response to Interrogatory ## 16 and 17, for the time period covering August 23, 2008, to August 23, 2011. Defendant must provide its supplemental response to Plaintiffs by July 20, 2012. The motion is denied as to Interrogatory ## 8 and 13 and Request for Production of Documents # 34 for the reasons stated in open court. The motion is also denied as to Plaintiffs' request for an order requiring Defendant to organize and label its document production because the court finds that Defendant's production to be in compliance with Rule 34. A status hearing is scheduled for July 26, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ma,)

Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge
or Magistrate Judge

CASE NUMBER
CASE
TITLE

James F. Holderman
11 C 5807

Sitting Judge if Other
than Assigned Judge

DATE

Young B. Kim
July 5, 2012

Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Motion hearing held. Plaintiffs’ motion to compel comScore, Inc. to respond to written discovery [104] is granted
in part and denied in part. For the reasons stated in open court, the motion is granted to the extent that Defendant
must conduct an exhaustive search to complete its response to Interrogatory ## 16 and 17, for the time period
covering August 23, 2008, to August 23, 2011. Defendant must provide its supplemental response to Plaintiffs
by July 20, 2012. The motion is denied as to Interrogatory ## 8 and 13 and Request for Production of Documents
# 34 for the reasons stated in open court. The motion is also denied as to Plaintiffs’ request for an order requiring
Defendant to organize and label its document production because the court finds that Defendant's production to
be in compliance with Rule 34. A status hearing is scheduled for July 26, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.

Notices mailed by Judicial staff.
00:35

Courtroom Deputy
Initials:

11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.

ma

Page 1 of 1