Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
120
MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held and continued to August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they are still working through the difficulties Plaintiffs have identified regarding the examination of documents produced by Defendant. Defendant reported that it is willing to grant Plaintiffs limited access to its proprietary software in order to resolve the reported difficulties. Parties are instructed to meet an confer to work out the details of this on-site inspection as well as a procedure to preserve Defendant's privileges. Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan is also ordered to turnover a draft of a stipulation to dismiss certain claims of his complaint to Defendant by August 14, 2012. Mailed notice (ma,)
Order Form (01/2005)
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge
or Magistrate Judge
CASE NUMBER
CASE
TITLE
James F. Holderman
11 C 5807
Sitting Judge if Other
than Assigned Judge
DATE
Young B. Kim
August 13, 2012
Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
Status hearing held and continued to August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that
they are still working through the difficulties Plaintiffs have identified regarding the examination of documents
produced by Defendant. Defendant reported that it is willing to grant Plaintiffs limited access to its proprietary
software in order to resolve the reported difficulties. Parties are instructed to meet an confer to work out the
details of this on-site inspection as well as a procedure to preserve Defendant's privileges. Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan
is also ordered to turnover a draft of a stipulation to dismiss certain claims of his complaint to Defendant by
August 14, 2012.
Notices mailed by Judicial staff.
00:30
Courtroom Deputy
Initials:
11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
ma
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?