Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 120

MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held and continued to August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they are still working through the difficulties Plaintiffs have identified regarding the examination of documents produced by Defendant. Defendant reported that it is willing to grant Plaintiffs limited access to its proprietary software in order to resolve the reported difficulties. Parties are instructed to meet an confer to work out the details of this on-site inspection as well as a procedure to preserve Defendant's privileges. Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan is also ordered to turnover a draft of a stipulation to dismiss certain claims of his complaint to Defendant by August 14, 2012. Mailed notice (ma,)

Download PDF
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE James F. Holderman 11 C 5807 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge DATE Young B. Kim August 13, 2012 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT Status hearing held and continued to August 23, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they are still working through the difficulties Plaintiffs have identified regarding the examination of documents produced by Defendant. Defendant reported that it is willing to grant Plaintiffs limited access to its proprietary software in order to resolve the reported difficulties. Parties are instructed to meet an confer to work out the details of this on-site inspection as well as a procedure to preserve Defendant's privileges. Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan is also ordered to turnover a draft of a stipulation to dismiss certain claims of his complaint to Defendant by August 14, 2012. Notices mailed by Judicial staff. 00:30 Courtroom Deputy Initials: 11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. ma Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?