Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 121

MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held and continued to September 14, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they have worked out their differences to resolve their outstanding issues with written discovery. Defendant reported that it has made revisions to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan's proposed stipulation to dismiss part of his complaint. Plaintiff Dunstan is ordered to respond to Defendant's revisions by August 31, 2012. If parties cannot agree on the scope of the stipulation, Plaintiff Dunstan to file a motion for leave of court to dismiss certain claims in his complaint by September 7, 2012. At the next status hearing, parties to report on their progress with oral discovery and Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures. Mailed notice (ma,)

Download PDF
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE James F. Holderman 11 C 5807 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge DATE Young B. Kim August 23, 2012 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT Status hearing held and continued to September 14, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they have worked out their differences to resolve their outstanding issues with written discovery. Defendant reported that it has made revisions to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan’s proposed stipulation to dismiss part of his complaint. Plaintiff Dunstan is ordered to respond to Defendant’s revisions by August 31, 2012. If parties cannot agree on the scope of the stipulation, Plaintiff Dunstan to file a motion for leave of court to dismiss certain claims in his complaint by September 7, 2012. At the next status hearing, parties to report on their progress with oral discovery and Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures. Notices mailed by Judicial staff. 00:10 Courtroom Deputy Initials: 11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. ma Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?