Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
121
MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held and continued to September 14, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported that they have worked out their differences to resolve their outstanding issues with written discovery. Defendant reported that it has made revisions to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan's proposed stipulation to dismiss part of his complaint. Plaintiff Dunstan is ordered to respond to Defendant's revisions by August 31, 2012. If parties cannot agree on the scope of the stipulation, Plaintiff Dunstan to file a motion for leave of court to dismiss certain claims in his complaint by September 7, 2012. At the next status hearing, parties to report on their progress with oral discovery and Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures. Mailed notice (ma,)
Order Form (01/2005)
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge
or Magistrate Judge
CASE NUMBER
CASE
TITLE
James F. Holderman
11 C 5807
Sitting Judge if Other
than Assigned Judge
DATE
Young B. Kim
August 23, 2012
Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
Status hearing held and continued to September 14, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., in courtroom 1944D. Parties reported
that they have worked out their differences to resolve their outstanding issues with written discovery. Defendant
reported that it has made revisions to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan’s proposed stipulation to dismiss part of his
complaint. Plaintiff Dunstan is ordered to respond to Defendant’s revisions by August 31, 2012. If parties cannot
agree on the scope of the stipulation, Plaintiff Dunstan to file a motion for leave of court to dismiss certain claims
in his complaint by September 7, 2012. At the next status hearing, parties to report on their progress with oral
discovery and Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures.
Notices mailed by Judicial staff.
00:10
Courtroom Deputy
Initials:
11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
ma
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?