Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
18
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0752-6420586. for RAY SARDO (Sardo, Ray)
(Revised 06/08)
United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
Case Title: MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN, individually and on behalf
Plantiff(s)
of a class of similarly situated individuals,
VS.
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Case Number:
I,
1:11-5807
Judge:
Defendant(s)
Hon. James F. Holderman
RAY SARDO
hereby apply to the Court
under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of
comScore, Inc.
by whom I have been retained.
I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts:
Title of Court
Date Admitted
United States District Court, Central District of California
03/24/2010
United States District Court, Southern District of California
United States District Court, Northern District of California
03/24/2010
03/25/2010
I have currently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this
Court in the following actions:
Case Number
Date of Application
(Granted or Denied)*
Case Title
*If denied, please explain:
(Attach additional form if
necessary)
Pursuant to Local Rule 83.15(a), applicants who do not have an office within the Northern District of Illinois must designate, at the
time of filing their initial notice or pleading, a member of the bar of this Court having an office within this District upon who service of
papers may be made.
Has the applicant designated local counsel?
Yes
x
No
If you have not designated local counsel, Local Rule 83.15(b) provides that the designation must be made within thirty (30) days.
Has the applicant ever been:
censured, suspended, disbarred, or otherwise disciplined by any court?
Yes
No
x
or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the
applicant's professional conduct?
Yes
No
x
transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the
bar of nay court?
Yes
No
x
denied admission to the bar of any court?
Yes
No
x
held in contempt of court?
Yes
No
x
NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of the incident(s) and the applicant's current
status before any court, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations
of the applicant's conduct may have been instituted.
I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of Illinois, effective November 12, 1991 (Local Rules 83.50
through 83.58), and the Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, effective December 15, 1992,
and will faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
September 27, 2011
S/
Ray Sardo
Date
Electronic Signature of Applicant
Last Name
Applicant's Name
Applicant's Law Firm
First Name
Sardo
Ray
A.
COOLEY LLP
Street Address
Applicant's Address
Middle Name/Initial
Room/Suite Number
5th Floor
101 California Street
City
State
ZIP Code
Work Phone Number
San Francisco
CA
94111
(415) 693-2102
(The pro hac vice admission fee is $100.00 for cases filed before February 1, 2001, and $50.00 for cases filed on or after that
date, and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective until such time as the fee has been paid.)
NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider filing a petition for admission to the general bar of the
Court. The fee for admission to the General Bar is $150.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $100.00 for cases filed
before February 1, 2001, and $50.00 for cases filed on or after that date. Admission to the general bar permits an attorney
to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application
for such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?