Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
182
ORDER Granting comScore's Motion to file documents under seal 173 . Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 3/6/13. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated individuals
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-5807
Chief Judge Holderman
Plaintiff,
Magistrate Judge Kim
v.
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING
COMSCORE’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Having considered Defendant comScore, Inc.’s (“comScore”) Motion to File Documents
Under Seal, and the Court having specifically reviewed the documents to assess the confidential
information contained therein, and having weighed the private need to maintain the information
as confidential against the public’s right to know that information for purposes of assessing good
cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
comScore’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal is hereby GRANTED;
2.
comScore may file under seal in their entirety Exhibits E, F, H, and M to the
Declaration of Robyn Bowland in support of comScore’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification;
3.
comScore may file under seal in its entirety Exhibit U, designated Attorneys’
Eyes Only—Confidential by Plaintiffs Mike Harris and Jeff Dunstan; and
4.
comScore may file partially under seal comScore’s Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, as well as Exhibit C to the Declaration
99999.77815/5198681.1
1
of Robyn Bowland in support of comScore’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Motion for Class Certification.
ENTER:
_______________________________
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Date: March 6, 2013
99999.77815/5198681.1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?