Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
218
NOTICE of Motion by Benjamin Scott Thomassen for presentment of motion for extension of time to complete discovery 217 before Honorable Young B. Kim on 10/8/2013 at 11:00 AM. (Thomassen, Benjamin)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated individuals,
Case No. 1:11-cv-5807
Plaintiffs,
Hon. James F. Holderman
v.
Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO:
[See Attached Service List]
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, October 8, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable Young B. Kim, or any
judge sitting in his stead in courtroom 1019 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, United
States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there present
Plaintiffs Mike Harris’s and Jeff Dunstan’s Motion to Modify Magistrate Judge Kim’s
Scheduling Order, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby served upon you.
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Dated: October 2, 2013
By: s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys
Benjamin S. Thomassen
EDELSON LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: (312) 589-6370
Fax: (312) 589-6378
bthomassen@edelson.com
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Benjamin S. Thomassen, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 2, 2013, I served
the above and foregoing Notice of Plaintiffs Mike Harris’s and Jeff Dunstan’s Motion to
Modify Magistrate Judge Kim’s Scheduling Order by causing true and accurate copies of such
paper to be transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system,
on this 2nd day of October 2013.
s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?