Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 218

NOTICE of Motion by Benjamin Scott Thomassen for presentment of motion for extension of time to complete discovery 217 before Honorable Young B. Kim on 10/8/2013 at 11:00 AM. (Thomassen, Benjamin)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. 1:11-cv-5807 Plaintiffs, Hon. James F. Holderman v. Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. NOTICE OF MOTION TO: [See Attached Service List] PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, October 8, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable Young B. Kim, or any judge sitting in his stead in courtroom 1019 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there present Plaintiffs Mike Harris’s and Jeff Dunstan’s Motion to Modify Magistrate Judge Kim’s Scheduling Order, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby served upon you. MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dated: October 2, 2013 By: s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Benjamin S. Thomassen EDELSON LLC 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Tel: (312) 589-6370 Fax: (312) 589-6378 bthomassen@edelson.com 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Benjamin S. Thomassen, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 2, 2013, I served the above and foregoing Notice of Plaintiffs Mike Harris’s and Jeff Dunstan’s Motion to Modify Magistrate Judge Kim’s Scheduling Order by causing true and accurate copies of such paper to be transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system, on this 2nd day of October 2013. s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?