Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 258

MOTION by Defendant comScore, Inc. to seal document sealed response, 256 , sealed document, 257 (Bowland, Robyn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-5807 Judge Holderman Magistrate Judge Kim v. COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. COMSCORE’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendant comScore, Inc. (“comScore”), pursuant to Local Rules 5.8 and 26.2, respectfully moves the Court for an Order granting them leave to file certain documents under seal in conjunction with comScore’s Opposition to Plaintiff Jeff Dusntan’s Renewed Motion to Compel comScore, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Written Discovery. In support of this Motion, comScore states as follows: 1. On November 6, 2013, concurrently with the filing of this Motion, comScore filed comScore’s Opposition to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan’s Renewed Motion to Compel Comscore, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Written Discovery (“Opposition”) and the Declaration of Robyn Bowland in support of the Opposition (“Bowland Declaration”) 2. Attached to the Bowland Declaration are the following documents that the Parties have marked with a Confidentiality Designation pursuant to the January 20, 2012 Protective Order entered by Magistrate Judge Kim in this case (“Protective Order”) (Dkt. No. 72). The Protective Order prohibits either Party from publicly disclosing documents marked as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—SOURCE CODE.” a. Exhibit B, a document Bates labeled CS0016810 and marked “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with the Protective Order. 3. Additionally, paragraph 2 of the Bowland Declaration references a document Bates labeled CS0096515 and marked “CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” under the Protective Order. 4. Accordingly, pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this case, comScore seeks leave to file Exhibit B, in its entirety, under seal. 5. Additionally, comScore seeks leave to file portions of paragraph 2 of the Bowland Declaration under seal. 6. Finally, because the Opposition references the contents of Exhibit B and paragraph 2 of the Bowland Declaration, as well as Exhibits previously filed under seal by Plaintiffs in Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan’s Renewed Motion to Compel Comscore, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Written Discovery (Dkt. No. 247), comScore seeks leave to file the Opposition partially under seal. WHEREFORE, comScore respectfully moves the Court, pursuant to Local Rules 5.8 and 26.2 for an Order: 1. Granting comScore leave to file Exhibit B under seal; 2. Granting comScore leave to file the Bowland Declaration partially under seal; and 2 3. Granting comScore leave to file comScore’s Opposition to Plaintiff Jeff Dunstan’s Renewed Motion to Compel Comscore, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Written Discovery partially under seal. DATED: Nov. 6, 2013 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP _/s/ Andrew H. Schapiro ____ Andrew H. Schapiro andrewschapiro@quinnemanuel.com Stephen Swedlow stephenswedlow@quinnemanuel.com Robyn Bowland robynbowland@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Telephone: (312) 705-7400 Facsimile: (312) 705-7499 Paul F. Stack pstack@stacklaw.com Mark William Wallin mwallin@stacklaw.com Stack & O’Connor Chartered 140 South Dearborn Street Suite 411 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 782-0690 Facsimile: (312) 782-0936 Attorneys for Defendant comScore, Inc. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been caused to be served on November 6, 2013 to all counsel of record via email. _/s/ Robyn Bowland____ Robyn Bowland 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?