Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
298
NOTICE of Motion by Benjamin Scott Thomassen for presentment of motion to compel 293 before Honorable Young B. Kim on 1/6/2014 at 11:00 AM. (Thomassen, Benjamin)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated individuals,
Case No. 1:11-cv-5807
Plaintiffs,
Hon. James F. Holderman
v.
Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF MOTION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Monday, January 6, 2014, at 11:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable Young B. Kim, or any
judge sitting in his stead in courtroom 1019 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, United
States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and then and there
present Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Magid Abraham, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby served upon you.
Dated: December 20, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
MIKE HARRIS AND JEFF DUNSTAN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF
SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS,
By: s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys
Jay Edelson
Rafey S. Balabanian
Chandler Givens
Benjamin S. Thomassen
EDELSON LLC
350 North LaSalle, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: (312) 589-6370
jedelson@edelson.com
rbalabanian@edelson.com
cgivens@edelson.com
bthomassen@edelson.com
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Benjamin S. Thomassen, an attorney, certify that on December 20, 2013, I served the
above and foregoing Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion, by causing true and accurate copies of such
paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic
filing system on this 20th day of December, 2013.
s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?