Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
335
NOTICE of Motion by Benjamin Scott Thomassen for presentment of motion to amend/correct, motion for relief 334 before Honorable James F. Holderman on 3/11/2014 at 09:00 AM. (Thomassen, Benjamin)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated individuals,
Case No. 1:11-cv-05807
Plaintiffs,
Hon. James F. Holderman
v.
Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF MOTION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, March 11th, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable James F. Holderman,
or any judge sitting in his stead in courtroom 2141 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Building,
United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there
present Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw and Correct Their Memorandum of Law in Support of
Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
served upon you.
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
By: s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys
Dated: February 24, 2014
Jay Edelson
jedelson@edelson.com
Rafey S. Balabanian
rbalabanian@edelson.com
Benjamin S. Thomassen
bthomassen@edelson.com
EDELSON PC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Class, and the Subclass
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Benjamin S. Thomassen, an attorney, hereby certify that on February 24, 2014, I served
the above and foregoing Notice of Motion by causing true and accurate copies of such paper to
be transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.
s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?