Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 64

MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held. Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiffs with its Windows-based source code as it existed on September 17, 2009. Prior to Defendant providing the source code, parties to file an agreed motion for entry of a protective order. To the extent that the parties would like to conduct additional discovery, they may proceed with such discovery based upon a mutual agreement. Defendant to file its motion to bifurcate discovery by January 12, 2012, and specify the discovery requests served by Plaintiffs it wishes to avoid. Plaintiffs to file their response by January 19, 2012, and Defendant to file its reply thereto by January 26, 2012. The court will issue its ruling electronically. Mailed notice (aac, )

Download PDF
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE James F. Holderman 11 C 5807 Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge Young B. Kim DATE January 5, 2012 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. DOCKET ENTRY TEXT Status hearing held. Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiffs with its Windows-based source code as it existed on September 17, 2009. Prior to Defendant providing the source code, parties to file an agreed motion for entry of a protective order. To the extent that the parties would like to conduct additional discovery, they may proceed with such discovery based upon a mutual agreement. Defendant to file its motion to bifurcate discovery by January 12, 2012, and specify the discovery requests served by Plaintiffs it wishes to avoid. Plaintiffs to file their response by January 19, 2012, and Defendant to file its reply thereto by January 26, 2012. The court will issue its ruling electronically. Notices mailed by Judicial staff. 00:15 Courtroom Deputy Initials: 11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc. aac Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?