Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
64
MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held. Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiffs with its Windows-based source code as it existed on September 17, 2009. Prior to Defendant providing the source code, parties to file an agreed motion for entry of a protective order. To the extent that the parties would like to conduct additional discovery, they may proceed with such discovery based upon a mutual agreement. Defendant to file its motion to bifurcate discovery by January 12, 2012, and specify the discovery requests served by Plaintiffs it wishes to avoid. Plaintiffs to file their response by January 19, 2012, and Defendant to file its reply thereto by January 26, 2012. The court will issue its ruling electronically. Mailed notice (aac, )
Order Form (01/2005)
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge
or Magistrate Judge
CASE NUMBER
CASE
TITLE
James F. Holderman
11 C 5807
Sitting Judge if Other
than Assigned Judge
Young B. Kim
DATE
January 5, 2012
Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
Status hearing held. Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiffs with its Windows-based source code as it existed on
September 17, 2009. Prior to Defendant providing the source code, parties to file an agreed motion for entry of
a protective order. To the extent that the parties would like to conduct additional discovery, they may proceed
with such discovery based upon a mutual agreement. Defendant to file its motion to bifurcate discovery by
January 12, 2012, and specify the discovery requests served by Plaintiffs it wishes to avoid. Plaintiffs to file their
response by January 19, 2012, and Defendant to file its reply thereto by January 26, 2012. The court will issue
its ruling electronically.
Notices mailed by Judicial staff.
00:15
Courtroom Deputy
Initials:
11C5807 Harris et al vs. comScore, Inc.
aac
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?