TimesLines, Inc v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 13

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0752-6432418. (Norberg, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
(Revised 06/08) United States District Court Northern District of Illinois MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Case Title: Plantiff(s) Timelines, Inc. VS. Facebook, Inc. Defendant(s) Case Number: 1:11-cv-06867 Judge: Honorable John W. Darrah Jeffrey T. Norberg I, hereby apply to the Court under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of Facebook, Inc. by whom I have been retained. I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts: Title of Court Date Admitted Northern District of California 1/12/2002 Central District of California 4/7/2007 Eastern District of Texas 11/13/2009 I have currently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this Court in the following actions: Case Number 1:11-cv-3052 Date of Application (Granted or Denied)* Case Title Facebook, Inc. v. Teachbook.com LLC Granted 6/1/2011 *If denied, please explain: (Attach additional form if necessary) Pursuant to Local Rule 83.15(a), applicants who do not have an office within the Northern District of Illinois must designate, at the time of filing their initial notice or pleading, a member of the bar of this Court having an office within this District upon who service of papers may be made. Has the applicant designated local counsel? Yes No If you have not designated local counsel, Local Rule 83.15(b) provides that the designation must be made within thirty (30) days. Has the applicant ever been: censured, suspended, disbarred, or otherwise disciplined by any court? Yes No or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the applicant's professional conduct? Yes No transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the bar of nay court? Yes No denied admission to the bar of any court? Yes No held in contempt of court? Yes No NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of the incident(s) and the applicant's current status before any court, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations of the applicant's conduct may have been instituted. I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of Illinois, effective November 12, 1991 (Local Rules 83.50 through 83.58), and the Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, effective December 15, 1992, and will faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 9/30/2011 S/ Jeffrey T. Norberg Date Electronic Signature of Applicant Last Name Applicant's Name Applicant's Law Firm First Name Jeffrey Norberg Middle Name/Initial T Cooley LLP Street Address Applicant's Address Room/Suite Number Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real City Palo Alto State ZIP Code CA 94306 Work Phone Number 650-843-5889 (The pro hac vice admission fee is $100.00 for cases filed before February 1, 2001, and $50.00 for cases filed on or after that date, and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective until such time as the fee has been paid.) NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider filing a petition for admission to the general bar of the Court. The fee for admission to the General Bar is $150.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $100.00 for cases filed before February 1, 2001, and $50.00 for cases filed on or after that date. Admission to the general bar permits an attorney to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application for such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?