U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Reisinger et al
Filing
160
MOTION by Defendant Grace Elizabeth Reisinger for judgment As A Matter Of Law (Nissen, William)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading
Commission,
Plaintiff,
v.
Grace Elizabeth Reisinger and
ROF Consulting, LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) No. 11 C 8567
)
) Judge Joan B. Gottschall
)
)
)
)
DEFENDANT REISINGER’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW –
AT THE CLOSE OF PLAINTIFF’S CASE
Pursuant to Rule 50(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., defendant Reisinger hereby moves for judgment
as a matter of law on the issues identified below on the ground that a reasonable jury would not
have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the plaintiff on these issues.
1.
Each of Counts 1 through 3 requires plaintiff to prove that defendant made a
material misrepresentation or omission. A reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient
evidentiary basis to find that defendant Reisinger made any material misrepresentations or
omissions to any participant in the NCCN commodity pool and therefore judgment should be
entered as a matter of law in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on Counts 1 – 3.
2.
Each of Counts 3 through 6 requires plaintiff to prove that defendant was
commodity pool operator of the NCCN commodity pool. A reasonable jury would not have a
legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find that defendant Reisinger was commodity pool operator
for the NCCN commodity pool and therefore judgment should be entered as a matter of law in
favor of defendant and against plaintiff on Counts 3 – 6.
a.
Under 7 U.S.C. §1a(5) (2000 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/3/2005)), a commodity
pool operator means:
7 USC 1a(5) Commodity pool operator
The term “commodity pool operator” means any person engaged in
a business that is of the nature of an investment trust, syndicate, or
similar form of enterprise, and who, in connection therewith,
solicits, accepts, or receives from others, funds, securities, or
property, either directly or through capital contributions, the sale of
stock or other forms of securities, or otherwise, for the purpose of
trading in any commodity for future delivery on or subject to the
rules of any contract market or derivatives transaction execution
facility, except that the term does not include such persons not
within the intent of the definition of the term as the Commission
may specify by rule, regulation, or order.
2000 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/3/2005)
b.
The undisputed evidence is that funds for commodity trading were received from
investors by ROF Consulting, LLC (“ROF”) and not by Reisinger personally.
c.
The undisputed evidence is that funds resulting from commodity trading were
disbursed to investors by ROF, and not by Reisinger personally.
d.
Plaintiff CFTC has alleged and obtained a default judgment against ROF on the
ground that it was a commodity pool operator for the NCCN commodity pool.
e.
The undisputed evidence is that Reisinger’s activities on behalf of the NCCN pool
were either as agent for ROF or NCCN, LLC and not in her personal capacity.
3.
A reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient basis to find that defendant
Reisinger was controlling person of ROF, LLC and therefore judgment should be entered in
favor of defendant against plaintiff as a matter of law on plaintiff’s claim that defendant is liable
for violations of ROF as controlling person.
2
a.
The undisputed evidence is that ROF had four member-managers, and Reisinger
was only one of these four persons.
b.
The undisputed evidence is that Alan Matthews had control over ROF’s bank
accounts, which precluded Reisinger from being the controlling person in relation to the receipt
and disbursement of pool participant funds, which is central to the definition of a commodity
pool operator. See 7 U.S.C. § 1a(5) (2000 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/3/2005)).
c.
There is no evidence that Reisinger solicited funds, securities, or property from
prospective participants in the NCCN commodity pool.
Date: September 9, 2016
s/ William J. Nissen
William Nissen
Angelo J. Suozzi
Sidley Austin LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
p: (312) 853-7742
f: (312) 853-7036
wnissen@sidley.com
asuozzi@sidley.com
Attorneys For Defendant
Grace Elizabeth Reisinger
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, William J. Nissen, an attorney, hereby certify that I have served copies of the
foregoing Defendant Reisinger’s Motion for Judgment As a Matter of Law upon the
following individuals by the Court’s ECF system on the 9th day of September, 2016.
Timothy J. Mulreany
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Division of Enforcement
Three Lafayette Center
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581
tmulreany@cftc.gov
Elizabeth N. Pendleton
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Division of Enforcement
525 West Monroe Street
Suite 1100
Chicago, IL 60661
ependleton@cftc.gov
s/ William J. Nissen
William J. Nissen
ACTIVE 217070004v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?