Smith V. Rosebud Farmstand et al

Filing 369

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 9/5/2017. Mailed notice(cdh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROSEBUD FARMSTAND, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 11-cv-9147 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion to execute and enter memorandum of judgment [366] is denied. In the federal courts, final judgments entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 are entered on a specific form, the AO-450. See Selective Ins. Co. v. City of Paris, 769 F.3d 501, 507 (7th Cir. 2014). The final judgment in this case [339] was entered in conformity with that procedure. Execution on a money judgment is covered in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69, and the Court is not aware of any role that a "memorandum of judgment" such as that requested by Plaintiff might play in carrying out the procedures referenced in Rule 69. Notice of motion date of 9/6/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Dated: September 5, 2017 __________________________________ Robert M. Dow, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?