Smith V. Rosebud Farmstand et al
Filing
369
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 9/5/2017. Mailed notice(cdh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
ROBERT SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROSEBUD FARMSTAND, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 11-cv-9147
Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff's motion to execute and enter memorandum of judgment [366] is denied. In the
federal courts, final judgments entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 are
entered on a specific form, the AO-450. See Selective Ins. Co. v. City of Paris, 769 F.3d 501,
507 (7th Cir. 2014). The final judgment in this case [339] was entered in conformity with that
procedure. Execution on a money judgment is covered in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69,
and the Court is not aware of any role that a "memorandum of judgment" such as that requested
by Plaintiff might play in carrying out the procedures referenced in Rule 69. Notice of motion
date of 9/6/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.
Dated: September 5, 2017
__________________________________
Robert M. Dow, Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?