Edwards v. Illinois Department of Finance Professional Regulations et al

Filing 280

ORDER: Presently before us is the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez on Plaintiff's motion to enforce the parties settlement agreement. (Mot. to Enforce (Dkt. No. 270 ); Report (Dkt. No. 279 ).) T he Report recommends denying Plaintiff's motion because we lack jurisdiction to hear this matter. (Report at 23.) Neither party filed objections to the Report by the deadline. After careful consideration of the Report and the parties' submi ssions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), we hereby adopt the Report. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for to enforce the settlement agreement is denied. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 5/31/2019. Mailed notice (ags, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FASCIA EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12 C 371 Hon. Marvin E. Aspen ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: Presently before us is the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez on Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. (Mot. to Enforce (Dkt. No. 270); Report (Dkt. No. 279).) The Report recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion because we lack jurisdiction to hear this matter. (Report at 2–3.) Neither party filed objections to the Report by the deadline. After careful consideration of the Report and the parties’ submissions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), we hereby adopt the Report. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for to enforce the settlement agreement is denied. It is so ordered. ___________________________________ Honorable Marvin E. Aspen United States District Judge Dated: May 31, 2019 Chicago, Illinois

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?