Netgear Inc. v. Innovatio IP Ventures LLC
Filing
12
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 2/21/2014. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent
Litigation
___________________________
This Document Relates To:
Case No. 1:12-cv-427
Judge James F. Holderman
Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier
All Cases
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
On this day, NETGEAR, Inc. (“NETGEAR”) and Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio
Management, LLC, and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) announced to the Court that
they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the above-captioned actions. The
Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be
GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by NETGEAR against
Innovatio and by Innovatio against NETGEAR in the above-captioned actions, including Case
Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1-12-cv-00427 (originally 1:11-cv-01139 (D. Del.)), are
dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims by Innovatio against NETGEAR customers
in any of the actions consolidated in Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 (including, but not limited to, 1:12cv-00427) based on their making (including using any apparatus or practicing any method in
making), using, selling, offering for sale, leasing, exporting, importing, or otherwise disposing of
any NETGEAR product or any combination of a NETGEAR product with one or more other
items, are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be
borne by the party incurring the same.
This is a final judgment.
Signed this 21st day of February, 2014.
___________________________________
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?