Rude Music Inc v. Newt 2012, Inc. et al

Filing 46

MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses 24 is granted in part and denied in part. Affirmative defenses 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 in the amended answer are stricken because they consist only of bare legal conclusions. Plaintiff's motion is denied as to affirmative defense 3, which is better dealt with based on a more complete factual record, and as to affirmative defense 13, which may be duplicative of defense 12, but if so plaintiff is not unduly prejudiced by that. (mk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois āˆ’ CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3 Eastern Division Rude Music Inc Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:12āˆ’cvāˆ’00640 Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly Newt 2012, Inc., et al. Defendant. NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, April 6, 2012: MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses [24] is granted in part and denied in part. Affirmative defenses 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 in the amended answer are stricken because they consist only of bare legal conclusions. Plaintiff's motion is denied as to affirmative defense 3, which is better dealt with based on a more complete factual record, and as to affirmative defense 13, which may be duplicative of defense 12, but if so plaintiff is not unduly prejudiced by that. (mk) ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?