Coltrane v. Midwest Coast Logistics, Inc. et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/26/2012:Mailed notice(srn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VANDER COLTRANE, Plaintiff, v. MIDWEST COAST LOGISTICS, INC. and ABDI J. FARAH, Individually, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12 C 4955 MEMORANDUM ORDER Vander Coltrane ("Coltrane") has sued Midwest Coast Logistics, Inc. ("Midwest") and Abdi Farah ("Farah"), invoking diversity jurisdiction over a dispute stemming from a vehicular collision on an interstate highway in Missouri (although Complaint ¶4 identifies Coltrane as a resident of Columbia, Missouri, this Court assumes that he is a Missouri citizen as well).1 It is clear that this action has nothing to do with Illinois except for Chicago being the asserted principal place of Midwest's business (Complaint ¶3). Indeed, no basis at all appears for exercising personal jurisdiction over Farah, who is identified as an Ohio citizen in Complaint ¶2. What is exceedingly plain is that even if (as may well be the case) the requisite diversity of citizenship exists, 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) makes this judicial district an improper venue for this 1 Despite the mandate of Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 8(a)(1), the Complaint is silent as to the grounds for federal subject matter jurisdiction. For purposes of this memorandum order, this Court has indulged the charitable assumption that the case sounds in diversity. Even that premise may be overly charitable, however, for as if to underscore the seeming unfamiliarity of Coltrane's counsel (a law firm officing in Corpus Christi, Texas) with federal practice, the ad damnum seeks "an amount in excess of $50,000 plus costs of suit," although the required amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction is of course $75,000-plus. lawsuit. Coltrane's attorneys are given until July 13, 2012 to file a statement justifying the filing of this action here, failing which this Court will dismiss both the Complaint and this action (without prejudice, of course, to suit being filed in an appropriate situs elsewhere). _________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: June 26, 2012. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?