Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
Filing
604
MOTION by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for judgment Unopposed (Tonkinson, Stuart)
Case: 1:12-cv-05198 Document #: 604 Filed: 02/18/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:17792
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORP. AS
RECEIVER FOR FOUNDERS BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHICAGO TITLE INS. CO., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 12-cv-5198
Honorable Judge Andrea R. Wood
FDIC-R’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Founders Bank (“FDIC-R”)
moves for entry of an amended judgment in accordance with the mandate issued by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and
Chicago Title & Trust Co. (collectively, “Chicago Title”) do not oppose the relief requested
herein.
1.
On July 16, 2018, this Court entered its initial judgment in this matter for FDIC-R
against Chicago Title in the amount of $1.45 million. [D.E. 410.] On March 10, 2020, this
Court entered an amended judgment for FDIC-R against Chicago Title in the amount of
$945,643.56. [D.E. 524.]
2.
On August 31, 2021, the Seventh Circuit issued its opinion remanding the case to
this Court to reverse the $500,000 reduction reflected in the amended judgment. [D.E. 603.]
Pursuant to that ruling, FDIC-R is entitled to an amended judgment in the principal amount of
$1,445,643.56. On January 28, 2022, the Seventh Circuit ruled that FDIC-R was entitled to postjudgment interest to run from the date of the original judgment, July 16, 2018. [D.E. 602.]
Mandate issued that same day. [D.E. 599.]
Case: 1:12-cv-05198 Document #: 604 Filed: 02/18/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:17793
3.
FDIC-R has prepared the attached proposed judgment to reflect the Seventh
Circuit’s rulings. A word copy of the proposed judgment will also be provided.
For the foregoing reasons, FDIC-R respectfully requests that the Court enter the attached
proposed judgment.
Respectfully submitted,
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR
FOUNDERS BANK
LOCAL COUNSEL
/s/ J.S. Tonkinson
Stuart Tonkinson
3501 Fairfax Avenue
Arlington VA 22226
Phone: 214-673-7549
jtonkinson@fdic.gov
Monica Maria Tynan (ARDC # 6210307)
300 South Riverside Drive, Suite 1700
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Phone: (312) 382-6555
mtynan@fdic.gov
John Church
3501 Fairfax Drive
Arlington VA 22226
Phone: 703-516-1394
jchurch@fdic.gov
FDIC-R’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT– Page 2
Case: 1:12-cv-05198 Document #: 604 Filed: 02/18/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:17794
EXHIBIT 1
Case: 1:12-cv-05198 Document #: 604 Filed: 02/18/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:17795
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Plaintiff(s),
Case No. 1:12-cv-05198
Judge Andrea R. Wood
v.
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title
And Trust Company,
Defendant(s).
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):
and against defendant(s) Chicago Title Insurance Company and Chicago Title And Trust
Company in the amount of $1,445,643.56,
which
includes
pre–judgment interest.
does not include pre–judgment interest.
Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from July 16, 2018.
Plaintiff(s) has fully recovered its costs of court in the amount of $53,270.69 from defendant(s).
.
in favor of defendant(s)and against plaintiff(s)
Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).
other:
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge Andrea R. Wood presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge Andrea R. Wood without a jury and the above decision was reached.
decided by Judge Andrea R. Wood on a motion
Date: __/__/2022
Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court
/s/David Lynn, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?