Arnold v. Graffia et al

Filing 112

MOTION by Defendant Visiontek Products, LLC for judgment (Rohan, Sean)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION WALLACE ARNOLD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. VISIONTEK PRODUCTS, LLC Defendant. NO: 13-cv-613 Honorable Andrea R. Wood DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Defendant, VisionTek Products, LLC, through its counsel, O’Hagan Meyer LLC, respectfully moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(b)(1) for an Entry of Judgment. In support of this Motion, Defendant states as follows: 1. On September 28, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment along with supporting briefs pursuant to Rule 56. (See ECF Dkt. Nos. 77-79). Thereafter, Defendant’s motion was fully briefed. (See ECF Dkt. Nos. 823-84, 90-91). 2. On March 17, 2017, this Court granted Summary Judgment in Defendant’s favor. (ECF Dkt. No. 111). However, the Memorandum Opinion and Order along with an Entry of Judgment was never filed with the CM/ECF Civil Docket System. 3. A judgment must be set out in a separate document unless it falls within a limited and enumerated exception under Rule 58(a). Fed. R. Civ Proc. 58(a). Unless this Court orders otherwise, the clerk must promptly prepare, sign, and enter a judgment in a separate document when (1) the jury returns a general verdict; (2) the court awards only costs or a sum certain; or (3) the court denies all relief. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 58(b). 4. In the present case, this Court denied all relief to Plaintiff when it granted 1 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on March 31, 2017. 5. As such, Defendant respectfully requests this Court to file the Memorandum Opinion and Order and an Entry of Judgment on behalf of Defendant. WHEREFORE, Defendant, VisionTek Products, LLC, respectfully requests that this honorable Court enter the following with the CM/ECF Civil Docket System: (1) the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Summary Judgment against Plaintiff and in Defendant’s favor; and (2) an Entry of Judgment on behalf of Defendant. Respectfully Submitted, By: Kevin M. O’Hagan (#6211446) Ryan T. Benson (#6312338) Sean G. Rohan (#6310029) O’HAGAN MEYER, LLC One East Wacker Drive, Suite 3400 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Tel: (312) 422-6100 Fax: (312) 422-6110 kohagan@ohaganmeyer.com rbenson@ohaganmeyer.com srohan@ohaganmeyer.com 2 /s/ Sean Rohan Counsel for Visiontek Products, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on this 29th day of June, 2017, I electronically filed DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Matthew J. Egan Eliot D. Hellman Kelly Ann Kono Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered One S. Wacker Dr., Ste. 2500 Chicago, IL 60606-4673 PH: 312.346.1973 FX: 312.346.8242 megan@pretzel-stouffer.com ehellman@pretzel-stouffer.com /s/ Sean G. Rohan Kevin M. O’Hagan (#6211446) Ryan T. Benson (#6312338) Sean G. Rohan (#6310029) O’HAGAN MEYER, LLC One East Wacker Drive, Suite 3400 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Tel: (312) 422-6100 Fax: (312) 422-6110 kohagan@ohaganmeyer.com rbenson@ohaganmeyer.com srohan@ohaganmeyer.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT VISIONTEK PRODUCTS, LLC 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?