Talley v. The Habitat Company
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 2/20/2013: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is granted. The plaintiff may prosecute her case without paying the filing fee. The motion for appointm ent of counsel 5 is denied. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before March 22, 2013. Mailed notice (For further detail see Written Opinion)(nf, )
Order Form (01/2005)
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Name of Assigned Judge
or Magistrate Judge
John J. Tharp Jr.
CASE NUMBER
13 C 01200
CASE
TITLE
Sitting Judge if Other
than Assigned Judge
DATE
2/20/2013
Talley v. The Habitat Company
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [4] is granted. The plaintiff may prosecute her
case without paying the filing fee. The motion for appointment of counsel [5] is denied. For the reasons set
forth below, the plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before March 22, 2013.
O[ For further details see text below.]
Notices mailed by Judicial staff.
STATEMENT
The plaintiff’s initial complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
for failure to state a claim. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires a complaint to contain a short and
plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. Here, the precise nature of the
plaintiff’s claim is hard to discern: she uses the form complaint for alleging a violation of constitutional rights
and indicates that that the defendant “conspired together to violate one or more of the plaintiff’s civil rights,”
but her narrative does not illuminate such a claim. First, there is only one defendant named, and no facts are
supplied to suggest who “conspired together.” Second, the complaint contains no factual allegations tending
to show that the defendant, who is apparently the plaintiff’s landlord or property manager, is a government
entity or has acted under color of state law, which is a prerequisite for liability for a constitutional violation.
See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988); London v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 600 F.3d 742, 747 (7th Cir. 2010).
To have acted under color of state law, a defendant’s actions must be fairly attributable to some government
entity. See Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., Inc., 457 U.S. 922, 937 (1982); Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance
Serv., 577 F.3d 816, 823 (7th Cir. 2009). Finally, the plaintiff does not refer to any particular constitutional
right (e.g., equal protection, due process) that was allegedly infringed. Given these shortcomings, the
complaint fails to put the defendant on notice of any plausible basis for a constitutional claim.
It could be that the plaintiff does not intend to allege a constitutional violation; her motion for appointment of
counsel, but not her complaint, refers to “housing discrimination,” which suggests a potential claim under the
Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. Plaintiff is not required to plead particular legal theories, but she
is required to put the defendant on fair notice of the basis of her claims. If she wishes to bring a statutory
claim of “housing discrimination” either instead of, or in addition to, a constitutional claim, she should
provide a short and plain statement of that claim with supporting factual allegations in her amended
complaint.
13C01200 Talley vs. The Habitat Company
Page 1 of 2
Finally, the plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may file
another such motion, with a more detailed explanation of her efforts to obtain legal representation, including
whether she contacted any attorneys who work on a contingency fee basis.
Courtroom Deputy
Initials:
13C01200 Talley vs. The Habitat Company
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?