Kuri v. Szwedo et al

Filing 428

MOTION by Plaintiff Anthony Kuri for judgment (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Loevy, Jonathan)

Download PDF
Case: 1:13-cv-01653 Document #: 428 Filed: 01/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:9425 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY KURI, (a.k.a. Ramsey Qurash) Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 13 CV 1653 Honorable Edmond E. Chang PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 1. On October 3, 2018, this Court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict, awarding $4,000,000.00 in compensatory damages and $50,000.00 in punitive damages to Plaintiff. Dkt. 313. 2. Pursuant to the Local Rule process, the parties were able to resolve their dispute concerning attorneys' fees and costs covering the same through November 20, 2018. See Dkt. 409. The fees that remained were unresolved pending the outcome of the appeal. 3. Once the jury verdict was upheld, the parties resumed their negotiations to reach agreement on the remaining fees and costs. To that end, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Schedule to Resolve Remaining Attorneys’ Fees Issues. Dkt. 409. 4. This Court denied the motion without prejudice and referred the parties to the magistrate for a settlement conference. Dkt. 410. 5. With the assistance of Magistrate Judge Cummings, the parties resolved the case in full. Dkt. 424. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks an order of this Court entering judgment for Plaintiff in the amount of $20,000.00 in costs, and $1,550,000.00 in attorneys' fees, for a total of $1,570,000.00. 1 Case: 1:13-cv-01653 Document #: 428 Filed: 01/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9426 6. A proposed judgment reflecting those amounts is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jon Loevy ___ Jon Loevy LOEVY & LOEVY 311 N. Aberdeen Street Chicago, Illinois 60607 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?